South African universities are changing in several very important ways; their entry standards are changing, their programmes are focusing more specifically on the outcomes that learners are required to achieve, and their student populations are becoming more diverse. These changes are occurring in a climate of increased
accountability. It is, therefore, important for universities to be concerned about the standards of their academic programmes and about the success rates of students. Together, these factors have produced a range of opinions about what needs to happen in universities if the diverse range of students is to be successful in
outcomes-based programmes that maintain high
standards. Some educators argue that entry standards are the most important determinants of success at university; others maintain that non-academic factors must also be considered. There is considerable evidence that the views and expectations about success held by
lecturers and students are not always
consistent. This article presents the
results of a recent empirical
investigation at the University of
Pretoria that attempted to identify the post-enrolment factors that lecturers and students perceived as having important influences on students'success in their
university studies. The study investigated the different expectations of first-year students, senior students and lecturers and
identified numerous important similarities and inconsistencies. Most notably, there was a high and significant correlation between the rankings the three groups (lecturers, first-year students and senior students) gave to 52 factors linked to successful university study. There
was also a high and significant correlation between the rankings of lecturers and senior students on 55 factors suggestive of unsuccessful university study. However, the perceptions of first-year students were not strongly correlated with either lectures or senior students. This suggests that first-year students may have unrealistic expectations about the non-academic factors that could reduce their chances of successful study. The results of the
research could be used in three ways.
University administrators could provide more supportive learning environments to enhance the chances that students will be successful and lecturers could also use the information to enhance the influences
of positive factors on student learning. The influence of negative factors could also be minimised accordingly. Finally students could also be assisted and
supported to approach university studies in a way that will increase their chances of success.
This pilot study investigates the impact of a tutorial model on the performance of
distance education students enrolled for an Advanced Certificate in Education (ACE)
programme. The aim of the support system is to enhance ...
Van Rooyen, Marietjie(South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2012-11)
SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Fourth-year medical students at the University of Pretoria are required to work with a primary
healthcare practitioner for two weeks. After the preceptorship, reflective photo-story reports on the ...
Van Schoor, Albert-Neels; Meiring, J.H.; Louw, F.S.(2008-09-29)
Considering the growing tendency and in often demand of making all Study guides and material electronically available to students, the question arises whether hard copies of the Study component of Study guides should be ...