Comparison of induction and recovery characteristics in dogs following diazepam-ketamine or propofol administration

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Bester, Lynette en
dc.contributor.coadvisor Dzikiti, Tarisai Brighton en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Ferreira, Jacques Paul en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-02T11:08:32Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-02T11:08:32Z
dc.date.created 2015/04/22 en
dc.date.issued 2014 en
dc.description Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2014. en
dc.description.abstract Objective: To compare anaesthetic induction and recovery characteristics of diazepam-ketamine combination to propofol alone in dogs undergoing elective orchidectomy. Experimental design: Prospective, randomised clinical trial. Animal population: Thirty six healthy adult male dogs of various breeds weighing 5.5 ± 2.3kg and aged 26 ± 13 months. Materials and Methods: After demeanour scoring (simple descriptive scale; (SDS); the dogs were sedated with morphine (0.3mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.02mg/kg) intramuscularly. Forty minutes after administration, a premedication score (SDS) was allocated. Immediately after premedication had been scored, general anaesthesia was induced with either a combination of diazepam and ketamine (D/K) or propofol (P) intravenously to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane. Scores for the quality of induction, intubation and degree of myoclonus were allocated (SDS). Orchidectomy was performed in a standard way by a single experienced surgeon. Recovery from anaesthesia was scored (SDS). Times to extubation and standing were recorded. Data were analysed for statistically significant differences using the t-test for parametric data and the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric data. The Kappa Reliability and Kendall Tau tests were used to assess the degree of agreement between the scorers for the scored characteristics. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in age, weight, cage rest score, premedication score and duration of maintenance of anaesthesia. Group P was associated with a poorer quality of induction and more pronounced myoclonus; but had better quality of recovery and shorter recovery times compared to group D/K. Conclusions: Diazepam-ketamine and propofol are associated with acceptable induction and recovery from anaesthesia. Propofol had inferior anaesthetic induction characteristics, but better and quicker recovery from anaesthesia compared to diazepam-ketamine in male dogs premedicated with morphine and acepromazine. en
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en
dc.description.degree MSc en
dc.description.department Companion Animal Clinical Studies en
dc.description.librarian tm2015 en
dc.identifier.citation Ferreira, JP 2014, Comparison of induction and recovery characteristics in dogs following diazepam-ketamine or propofol administration, MSc Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46266> en
dc.identifier.other A2015 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46266
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © 2015 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en
dc.subject UCTD en
dc.title Comparison of induction and recovery characteristics in dogs following diazepam-ketamine or propofol administration en
dc.type Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record