Risk factors associated with Rift Valley fever epidemics in South Africa in 2008–11
Loading...
Date
Authors
Metras, Raphaelle
Jewell, Chris
Porphyre, Thibaud
Tompson, P.N. (Peter N.)
Pfeiffer, Dirk U.
Collins, Lisa M.
White, Richard G.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Abstract
Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a zoonotic and vector-borne disease, mainly present in Africa, which represents a
threat to human health, animal health and production. South Africa has experienced three major RVF
epidemics (1950–51, 1973–75 and 2008–11). Due to data scarcity, no previous study has quantified risk
factors associated with RVF epidemics in animals in South Africa. Using the 2008–11 epidemic datasets, a
retrospective longitudinal study was conducted to identify and quantify spatial and temporal environmental
factors associated with RVF incidence. Cox regressions with a Besag model to account for the spatial effects
were fitted to the data. Coefficients were estimated by Bayesian inference using integrated nested Laplace
approximation. An increase in vegetation density was the most important risk factor until 2010. In 2010,
increased temperature was the major risk factor. In 2011, after the large 2010 epidemic wave, these
associations were reversed, potentially confounded by immunity in animals, probably resulting from earlier
infection and vaccination. Both vegetation density and temperature should be considered together in the
development of risk management strategies. However, the crucial need for improved access to data on
population at risk, animal movements and vaccine use is highlighted to improve model predictions.
Description
Keywords
Risk factors, Viral infections, South Africa (SA), Rift Valley fever (RVF), Zoonotic diseases, Vector-borne diseases
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Metras, R, Jewell, C, Porphyre, T, Thompson, PN, Pfeiffer, DU, Collins, LM & White, RG 2015, 'Risk factors associated with Rift Valley fever epidemics in South Africa in 2008–11', Scientific Reports. vol. 5, no. 9492, pp.1-7. DOI:10.1038/srep09492 (2015).