Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
dc.contributor.author | Muchuru, Shepherd![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Botai, Mihloti Christina![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Botai, Joel Ongego![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Adeola, Abiodun Morakinyo![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-26T09:42:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-03-26T09:42:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, monthly, maximum seasonal, and maximum annual hydrometeorological (i.e., evaporation, lake water levels, and rainfall) data series from the Kariba catchment area of the Zambezi River basin, Zimbabwe, have been analyzed in order to determine appropriate probability distribution models of the underlying climatology from which the data were generated. In total, 16 probability distributions were considered and the Kolmogorov–Sminorv (KS), Anderson–Darling (AD), and chi-square (x2) goodness-of-fit (GoF) tests were used to evaluate the best-fit probability distribution model for each hydrometeorological data series. A ranking metric that uses the test statistic from the three GoF tests was formulated and used to select the most appropriate probability distribution model capable of reproducing the statistics of the hydrometeorological data series. Results showed that, for each hydrometeorological data series, the best-fit probability distribution models were different for the different time scales, corroborating those reported in the literature. The evaporation data series was best fit by the Pearson system, the Lake Kariba water levels series was best fit by theWeibull family of probability distributions, and the rainfall series was best fit by the Weibull and the generalized Pareto probability distributions. This contribution has potential applications in such areas as simulation of precipitation concentration and distribution and water resources management, particularly in the Kariba catchment area and the larger Zambezi River basin, which is characterized by (i) nonuniform distribution of a network of hydrometeorological stations, (ii) significant data gaps in the existing observations, and (iii) apparent inherent impacts caused by climatic extreme events and their corresponding variability. | en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo | 2015-10-31 | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | hb2015 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://www2.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/journals/earth-interactions/ | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Muchuru, S, Botai, CM, Botai, JO & Adeola, AM 2015, 'The hydrometeorology of the Kariba catchment area based on the probability distributions', Earth Interactions, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1-18. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1087-3562 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1175/EI-D-14-0019.1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/44181 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | American Meteorological Society | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2015 by the American Meteorological Society | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Africa | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Hydrologic models | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Climate variability | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Hydrometeorology | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Kariba catchment area | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Zambezi River basin | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Zimbabwe | en_ZA |
dc.title | The hydrometeorology of the Kariba catchment area based on the probability distributions | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |