The block method of vaccination against heartwater

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Heartwater : Past, Present and Future. Workshop (1986 : Kruger National Park, South Africa)
dc.contributor.author Du Plessis, J.L.
dc.contributor.author Malan, Letitia
dc.contributor.editor Bigalke, R.D.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-20T08:29:11Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-20T08:29:11Z
dc.date.created 2014
dc.date.issued 1987
dc.description The articles have been scanned in colour with a HP Scanjet 5590; 600dpi. Adobe Acrobat XI Pro was used to OCR the text and also for the merging and conversion to the final presentation PDF-format. en_ZA
dc.description.abstract A critical evaluation is made of reports in the literature on the block method of vaccination and the relevant factors that play a role in the immunization against heartwater are also discussed. The most important of these is the fact that in heartwater immunogenicity parallels pathogenicity. It is shown that the more severe the reaction of the host to the immunizing infection, the stronger its immunity to subsequent challenge. The importance of this principle in the block method is emphasized. Other factors that play a role are the average incubation periods recorded in the different domestic ruminants after experimental infection and differences in age and breed susceptibility. The survival rate of experimentally infected Bonsmara cattle and Merino sheep that were treated on different days of the febrile reaction also serve as a guideline to determine the day after infection on which block treatment can be applied. The danger of a fatal recrudescent infection if block treatment is given too early, necessitating additional treatment and close observation, is indicated. In conclusion, recommendations on the day of block treatment are made for each domestic ruminant species. It is emphasized that the other methods of immunization of large groups of animals, such as treatment only after the commencement of the febrile reaction determined by the daily recording of early morning temperatures, or the prolonged prophylactic chemotherapy of susceptible stock exposed to heavy tick challenge, are preferable to the block method. The block method does, however, find application in certain instances where these procedures are impractical or inappropriate. en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Du Plessis, JL & Malan, L 1987, 'The block method of vaccination against heartwater’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 493-495. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0330-2465
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/44081
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Published by the Government Printer, Pretoria. en_ZA
dc.rights ©ARC - Onderstepoort and Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria (original). ©University of Pretoria. Dept. of Library Services (digital). en_ZA
dc.subject Veterinary medicine en_ZA
dc.subject.lcsh Veterinary medicine -- South Africa
dc.title The block method of vaccination against heartwater en_ZA
dc.title.alternative Heartwater : past, present and future : proceedings of a workshop held at Berg en Dal, Kruger National Park, on 8-16 September 1986 en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record