Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Southern African Transport Conference 7-10 July 2014 "Leading Transport into the Future", CSIR International Convention Centre, Pretoria, South Africa.
National and international literature and research generally indicate that traffic circles
(roundabouts) have a much better safety record than stop controlled and signalised
intersections, especially when the severity of accidents are taken into account. A
comprehensive investigation was done in eThekwini to evaluate the safety of traffic circles.
Thirteen traffic circles were evaluated from a safety point of view, and compared to the
safety record of twenty one traffic signals and ten stop controlled intersections. The
intersections were chosen to cover a wide range of traffic volumes, so that accident rates
could be plotted against average daily traffic for all three intersection types. Both accident
rates and accident severity rates were analysed. Contrary to what is found in the literature,
results showed that many traffic circles had higher accident rates and accident severity
rates than traffic signals for the same average daily traffic. For higher daily traffic volumes
(above 20 000 vehicles per day), traffic circles were found to have an alarmingly high
accident rate compared to what is found in the literature. Possible reasons for the high
accident rate at high volume circles are given, and the applicability of the research to the
rest of South Africa is noted.
This paper was transferred from the original CD ROM created for this conference. The material was published using Adobe Acrobat 10.1.0 Technology. The original CD ROM was produced by CE Projects cc. Postal Address: PO Box 560 Irene 0062 South Africa. Tel.: +27 12 667 2074 Fax: +27 12 667 2766 E-mail: email@example.com