Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mutero, Clifford Maina
dc.contributor.author Kramer, Randall A.
dc.contributor.author Paul, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.author Lesser, Adriane
dc.contributor.author Miranda, Marie Lynn
dc.contributor.author Mboera, Leonard E.G.
dc.contributor.author Kiptui, Rebecca
dc.contributor.author Kabatereine, Narcis
dc.contributor.author Ameneshewa, Birkinesh
dc.date.accessioned 2014-12-01T07:31:09Z
dc.date.available 2014-12-01T07:31:09Z
dc.date.issued 2014-08-08
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Policy decisions for malaria control are often difficult to make as decision-makers have to carefully consider an array of options and respond to the needs of a large number of stakeholders. This study assessed the factors and specific objectives that influence malaria control policy decisions, as a crucial first step towards developing an inclusive malaria decision analysis support tool (MDAST). METHODS: Country-specific stakeholder engagement activities using structured questionnaires were carried out in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The survey respondents were drawn from a non-random purposeful sample of stakeholders, targeting individuals in ministries and non-governmental organizations whose policy decisions and actions are likely to have an impact on the status of malaria. Summary statistics across the three countries are presented in aggregate. RESULTS: Important findings aggregated across countries included a belief that donor preferences and agendas were exerting too much influence on malaria policies in the countries. Respondents on average also thought that some relevant objectives such as engaging members of parliament by the agency responsible for malaria control in a particular country were not being given enough consideration in malaria decision-making. Factors found to influence decisions regarding specific malaria control strategies included donor agendas, costs, effectiveness of interventions, health and environmental impacts, compliance and/acceptance, financial sustainability, and vector resistance to insecticides. CONCLUSION: Malaria control decision-makers in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania take into account health and environmental impacts as well as cost implications of different intervention strategies. Further engagement of government legislators and other policy makers is needed in order to increase funding from domestic sources, reduce donor dependence, sustain interventions and consolidate current gains in malaria. en_US
dc.description.librarian am2014 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Global Environment Facility (GEF), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (GEF Project ID 3346). en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.malariajournal.com/ en_US
dc.identifier.citation Mutero, CM, Kramer, RA, Paul, C, Lesser, A, Miranda, ML, Mboera, LE, Kiptui, R, Kabatereine, N & Ameneshewa, B 2014, 'Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania', Malaria Journal, vol. 13, art. 305, pp. 1-10. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1475-2875
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1475-2875-13-305
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/42719
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.rights © 2014 Mutero et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Malaria en_US
dc.subject Policy makers en_US
dc.subject Decision-analysis tools en_US
dc.subject Multi-sectoral approach en_US
dc.subject Malaria decision analysis support tool (MDAST) en_US
dc.title Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record