Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
dc.contributor.author | Bergh, Anne-Marie![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Grimbeek, J. (Jackie)![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | May, Win![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Gülmezoglu, A. Metin![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Khan, Khalid S.![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Kulier, Regina![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Pattinson, Robert Clive![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-28T08:47:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-28T08:47:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, there has been a renewed interest in measuring perceptions regarding different aspects of the medical educational environment. A reliable tool was developed for measuring perceptions of the educational environment as it relates to evidence-based medicine as part of a multicountry randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinically integrated evidence- based medicine course. Participants from 10 specialties completed the questionnaire. A working dataset of 518 observations was available. Two independent subsets of data were created for conducting an exploratory factor analysis (n=244) and a confirmatory factor analysis (n=274), respectively. The exploratory factor analysis yielded five 67-item definitive instruments, with five to nine dimensions; all resulted in acceptable explanations of the total variance (range 56.6–65.9%). In the confirmatory factor analysis phase, all goodnessof- fit measures were acceptable for all models (root mean square error of approximation ≤0.047; comparative fit index≥0.980; normed χ² ≤1.647; Bentler-Bonett normed fit index ≥0.951). The authors selected the factorisation with seven dimensions (factor-7 instrument) as the most useful on pragmatic grounds and named it Evidence-Based Medicine Educational Environment Measure 67 (EBMEEM-67). Cronbach’s α for subscales ranged between 0.81 and 0.93. The subscales are: ‘Knowledge and learning materials’; ‘Learner support’; ‘General relationships and support’; ‘Institutional focus on EBM’; ‘Education, training and supervision’; ‘EBM application opportunities’; and ‘Affirmation of EBM environment’. The EBMEEM-67 can be a useful diagnostic and benchmarking tool for evaluating the perceptions of residents of the environment in which evidence-based medicine education takes place. | en_US |
dc.description.librarian | hb2014 | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://ebm.bmj.com | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Bergh, A-M, Grimbeek, J, May, W, Gülmezoglu, AM, Khan, KS, Kulier, R &, Pattinson, RC 2014, 'Measurement of perceptions of educational environment in evidence-based medicine', Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 123-131. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-5524 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1473-6810 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1136/eb-2014-101726 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41817 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_US |
dc.rights | © BMJ Publishing Group | en_US |
dc.subject | Measurement of perceptions | en_US |
dc.subject | Educational environment | en_US |
dc.subject | Evidence-based medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Measurement of perceptions of educational environment in evidence-based medicine | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |