Area utilization patterns of humpback dolphins (Sousa plumbea) in Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Keith, Mark
Atkins, Shanan
Johnson, Alice E.
Karczmarski, Leszek

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

Geographically referenced data on humpback dolphin (Sousa plumbea) distribution and behaviour were collected in Richards Bay, South Africa, between 1998 and 2006. Utilization distributions presented a clear pattern in the distribution of dolphin activities and use of various locations within the study area. The 50 % kernel density estimate (core area) for foraging/feeding (2.1 km2) was clustered around the harbour mouth (including the shark net installation). The core areas for resting, socialising and travelling were more widespread ([2.95 km2). A mixed effects model indicated that location (longitude and latitude), distance from shore, year and group size are important variables in predicting foraging/feeding behaviour as opposed to other behaviours. The resting core was found in the southern part of study area and socialising was less clustered. This indicates preferential use of certain areas for specific behaviours. The overlap of foraging/ feeding areas with stationary fishing gear (shark nets) and boat traffic are a major concern due to the risk of humaninduced incidental mortalities. Any future alteration of the coastal area of Richards Bay, particularly development in the harbour, should be considered carefully, as further intrusion into areas critical to humpback dolphins, such as their foraging grounds, will inevitably carry negative implications for this already severely impacted population.

Description

Keywords

Kernel density estimates, Behavioural habitat preference, Humpback dolphins, Coastal conservation management, Richards Bay harbour

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Keith, M, Atkins, S, Johnson, AE & Karczmarski, L 2013, 'Area utilization patterns of humpback dolphins (Sousa plumbea) in Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa', Journal of Ethology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 261-274.