Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments from polluted rivers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Moyo, Stanley
McCrindle, Rob
Mokgalaka-Fleischmann, Ntebogeng Sharon
Myburgh, Jan G.
Mujuru, Munyaradzi

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

Abstract

Over the past few decades, in response to growing concerns about the impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on human health, a variety of environmental forensics and geochemical techniques have emerged for studying organic pollutants. These techniques include chemical fingerprinting, receptor modeling, and compound-specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA). Chemical fingerprinting methodology involves the use of diagnostic ratios. Receptor modeling techniques include the chemical mass balance (CMB) model and multivariate statistics. Multivariate techniques include factor analysis with multiple linear regression (FA/MLR), positive matrix factorization (PMF), and UNMIX. This article reviews applications of chemical fingerprinting, receptor modeling, and CSIA; comments on their uses; and contrasts the strengths and weaknesses of each methodology.

Description

Keywords

Chemometrics, Diagnostic ratios, Factor analysis, Mass spectrometry, Sediments, Source apportionment, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Moyo, S, McCrindle, R, Mokgalaka, N, Myburgh, JG & Mujuru, M 2013, 'Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments from polluted rivers', Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 2175-2196.