Consumer debt relief in South Africa : should the insolvency system provide for NINA debtors? : lessons from New Zealand

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Coetzee, Hermie
Rostoff, Melanie

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Abstract

South African natural person insolvency law has remained largely creditor-orientated despite the international trend to assist over-indebted debtors. Furthermore, although the South African system provides for a number of debt relief procedures, the entry requirements are of such a nature that most debtors are effectively excluded from any form of relief and therefore bound to their desperate situations. The majority of these excluded debtors fall within the no income and no assets (the so-called No Income No Asset (NINA) debtors) category-the main feature of this article. In the South African insolvency system, a person can therefore be ‘too poor to go bankrupt’. With reference to international principles and a thorough comparative study of the New Zealand system, the South African system is analysed, and some recommendations are made in order to provide a more accessible, effective and nondiscriminate system with specific focus on the plight of the NINA debtor. This is done by keeping the complex South African debt and poverty situation in mind as it is acknowledged that any reform should take cognisance of the unique socio-economic and cultural background. It is recognised that providing relief to the NINA category debtors will have an impact on the economy. However, it is submitted that the exclusion of this group will be even more expensive as it creates an obstacle for these debtors to enter the formal sector and economy, thereby discouraging broader economic growth.

Description

Keywords

South African natural person insolvency law, No Income No Asset (NINA) debtors

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Coetzee, H & Roestoff, M 2013, 'Consumer debt relief in South Africa-should the insolvency system provide for NINA debtors? Lessons from New Zealand', International Insolvency Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 188-210.