Abstract:
The severe acute respiratory disease syndrome or SARS epidemic emerged in Hong
Kong, China, in 2002 with a mortality rate of 15%. The etiological agent for SARS was
identified to be a previously unrecognized coronavirus (SARS-CoV) which was found to be
zoonotic in origin. A possible reservoir for the SARS-CoV was proposed to be the Chinese
horseshoe bat species (Rhinolophus spp.) due to the detection of SARS-related bat
coronaviruses (BtCoV) within these bat species. Since the SARS-CoV epidemic, new
interest regarding the origin and pathogenicity of coronaviruses has been generated. As
such, surveillance studies of BtCoV in numerous bat species have been performed in Asia,
Europe, North and South America as well as 3 African countries. Recent BtCoV
investigations in Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria identified BtCoV from both the Alpha- and
Betacoronavirus genera and provided the first evidence for the presence of coronaviruses in
African bats. Previously, the presence of antibodies against SARS-related CoV has been
reported in two bat species native to South Africa. This study investigated the possible
presence of BtCoV in a panel of bat specimens collected from sites in South Africa and
Rwanda, and how they are related to previously detected BtCoVs from other parts of the
world.
Here we report the development of two PCR assays, the PanBtCoV/9 primer nested
RT-PCR and PanBat/AB/6 primer hemi-nested RT-PCR assay, which were used in
coronavirus detection from alimentary specimens collected from 15 bat genera. The
combined assays amplified coronavirus RNA from 5 samples of the 201 analysed samples
collected in South Africa (n=113) and Rwanda (n=88).
Three alphacoronaviruses were detected in 3 different South African bat species,
Miniopterus spp. (Miniopterus-Bat coronavirus/Irene/South Africa/2009), Neoromicia
capensis (Neoromicia-Bat coronavirus/167/South Africa/2007), and Mops midas (Mops-Bat
coronavirus/1364/South Africa/2011). From Rwanda, a single betacoronavirus, a SARSrCoV was detected within 2 Rhinolophus spp. individuals (Rh-BtCoV/441/Rwanda/08 and Rh-
BtCoV/445/Rwanda/08). Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences was performed and
showed that the South African Miniopterus alphacoronavirus and the Rwandan
betacoronavirus cluster together with previously detected African BtCoV from the same host
genera. The South African alphacoronavirus from Mops midas was closely related to an
alphacoronavirus identified within another member of the Molossidae family, Chaerephon
spp. from Kenya. Being the first BtCoV identified from the Neoromicia genus, no African
BtCoV sequences were available for comparison and as such the virus clustered together
with European BtCoV from the Nyctalus spp., another member of the Vespertilioninae
subfamily.
This study has detected the first BtCoV viral RNA from the native bat species of South
Africa and Rwanda, providing confirmation to the presence of bat coronaviruses circulating
in these countries. From these preliminary results further investigations into the prevalence
and infection cycles of bat coronaviruses in specific bat populations can be performed in the
future.
The possibility of either these alpha- or betacoronaviruses spilling over and eventually
adapting to and infecting other species, though unlikely, cannot be excluded since such rare
events are hypothetically responsible for the establishment coronaviruses in humans,
livestock, poultry and pets. Caution may still be merited when interacting with bats in roosts
and caves.