An assessment of the constitution of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in southern Africa within the Bill of Rights as enshrined in the South African Constitution Act 108/1996

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Hofmeyr, J.W. (Johannes Wynand), 1947- en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Mashiane, Mafabo Andries Bernard en
dc.date.accessioned 2013-09-07T07:36:04Z
dc.date.available 2008-08-05 en
dc.date.available 2013-09-07T07:36:04Z
dc.date.created 2006-05-04 en
dc.date.issued 2008-08-05 en
dc.date.submitted 2008-07-28 en
dc.description Dissertation (MA(Theology) Church History)--University of Pretoria, 2008. en
dc.description.abstract The constitution of ELCSA was adopted in the constitutional assembly held on 15 to 19 December 1975 at Rustenburg, Tlhabane. The constitution of South Africa was adopted on 08 May 1996 and amended on 11 October 1996 by the constitutional assembly. It is obvious from this situation that the ELCSA constitution was put together and adopted during the rule of the National Party in consideration of the constitution of South Africa at the time. This suggests that the bill of rights was not taken into account when the constitution of ELCSA was written. The church‘s top down management system of administration is questionable. The harmony of rights and the ELCSA constitution was tested. The labour relations requirements are not taken into consideration by the ELCSA constitution given the procedures followed to add in addressing employee disputes. The ELCSA constitution was critically evaluated for compliance. The areas of the South African Constitution that were not considered at the initial stage of the church constitution were identified during the study. It is imperative though that the Church should not find her self-making concessions on issues that are contrary to Christian beliefs and norms that form the basis of the faith. Dr Martin Luther’s two kingdoms provided some guidance when the church was under pressure regarding certain issues that are required by the law of the country. Particularly the church does not condone abortion. In this study it was established that some areas require the church to mobilise and challenge the state. The study is concluded by a discussion of areas that present conflict between the church and legal requirements, areas that the church is omitting to do and areas that the church has to take a stand on. This discussion included recommendations that the church has to consider ensuring that legislation is complied with and that there is no conflict with the church constitution. en
dc.description.availability unrestricted en
dc.description.department Church History and Church Policy en
dc.identifier.citation a 2005G564 en
dc.identifier.other /ag en
dc.identifier.upetdurl http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-07282008-080435/ en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/26743
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © University of Pretoria 2005G564 / en
dc.subject Church and the freedom of assembly and demonstrati en
dc.subject Church and the bill of rights en
dc.subject Church and application of rights en
dc.subject Eclsa constitution en
dc.subject Church and labour relations act en
dc.subject Elcsa non-compliance en
dc.subject Church and children’s rights en
dc.subject Church and the courts en
dc.subject Church and freedom of information en
dc.subject Equality and biblical tone on equity en
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.title An assessment of the constitution of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in southern Africa within the Bill of Rights as enshrined in the South African Constitution Act 108/1996 en
dc.type Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record