Factors in the measurement of cognitive load of multimedia learning

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Strehler, Anne en
dc.contributor.advisor Cronje, Johannes Christoffel en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Smith, Maria Elizabeth en
dc.date.accessioned 2013-09-06T22:41:13Z
dc.date.available 2008-07-15 en
dc.date.available 2013-09-06T22:41:13Z
dc.date.created 2008-04-15 en
dc.date.issued 2007 en
dc.date.submitted 2008-06-18 en
dc.description Dissertation (MEd (Computer-Integrated Education))--University of Pretoria, 2007. en
dc.description.abstract In this study, the author investigated factors that influence the direct measurement of cognitive load using the dual-task method. The dual-task method is an unambiguous and objective technique to measure cognitive load. The primary task was to master content in a lesson about the Autonomic Nervous System. The secondary task was to respond to a symbol that changed colour by pressing the Enter key. The time between the symbol changing colour and the response of the student was measured. Two versions of the multimedia program tested the influence of the presentation format and instructional strategy on cognitive load. Each version of the program was further subdivided into four lessons, which were used to test the influence of the position of the secondary task on the cognitive load. All the data was collected electronically. The statistical analysis revealed that the position of the secondary task does not influence cognitive load (F (1, 2661) = 3.25, p = 0.071). The presentation format and instructional strategy used in this study however did result in a significant difference between the cognitive load of the two versions. The mean cognitive load of the version using animation was 6.408 and that of the version using predominantly static images and text was 5.684. This difference was found to be highly significant (F (1, 2661) = 52.39, p <.0001). It was concluded that using animation to present content required more mental effort by participants than using images and text to present the same content. en
dc.description.availability unrestricted en
dc.description.department Curriculum Studies en
dc.identifier.citation a 2007 E944 en
dc.identifier.other /ag en
dc.identifier.upetdurl http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-06182008-142102/ en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25611
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © University of Pretoria 2007 E944 / en
dc.subject Multimedia learning en
dc.subject Cognitive load en
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.title Factors in the measurement of cognitive load of multimedia learning en
dc.type Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record