Evaluation of the functional quality of cowpea-fortified traditional African sorghum foods using instrumental and descriptive sensory analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Anyango, Joseph Ochieng
dc.contributor.author De Kock, Henrietta Letitia
dc.contributor.author Taylor, J.R.N. (John Reginald Nuttall)
dc.date.accessioned 2012-09-20T07:24:47Z
dc.date.available 2012-09-20T07:24:47Z
dc.date.issued 2011-12
dc.description.abstract Despite nutritional advantages, the functional quality of cereal foods tends to decline when fortified with legumes. Traditional African cowpea-fortified sorghum foods were evaluated using instrumental and descriptive sensory analyses. Two sorghum cultivars, NS 5511 (tannin-type) and Orbit (non-tannin-type) were fortified with cowpea (70:30 ratio). Fortification reduced uji (fermented thin porridge) pasting peak viscosity and cool paste viscosity by up to 23% and 12%, respectively, probably as a result of starch content being reduced. NS 5511 injera (fermented thin flatbread) stiffness increased by up to 25%, probably due to a reduction in tannin content. Orbit injera stiffness reduced by up to 22% probably because increased protein content reduced starch retrogradation. Fortification increased the firmness of Orbit ugali (unfermented stiff porridge) by 45% and 17% as assessed by TA-XT2 Texture Analyser and the descriptive sensory panel, respectively. There was a 20% decrease in instrumental firmness of NS 5511 ugali as a result of fortification, which was not detected by the sensory panel. Fortification had generally no effect on the stickiness of ugali. Fortified ugali had a characteristic cowpea flavour. Principal component analysis (PCA) of ugali sensory attributes indicated a 30% variation due to the presence of cowpea. Most of the variation (47%) was attributed to sorghum cultivar. Sensory panel analysis concerning ugali firmness and stickiness correlated positively with the instrumental texture analysis. Fortification with cowpea affects texture and taste of traditional African sorghum foods, the extent to which largely depends on the sorghum cultivar concerned. Instrumental texture analysis relates well with human perception of sorghum food texture and can rapidly predict the effects of fortification with legumes on such foods. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The African Biofortified Sorghum (ABS) Project en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt en_US
dc.identifier.citation Joseph O. Anyango, Henriëtte L. de Kock & John R.N. Taylor, Evaluation of the functional quality of cowpea-fortified traditional African sorghum foods using instrumental and descriptive sensory analysis, LWT-Food Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2126-2133 (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.010. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0023-6438 (print)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.010
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/19851
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.rights © 2011 Elsevier. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in LWT-Food Science and Technology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in LWT-Food Science and Technology, vol 44, issue 10, December 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.010. en_US
dc.subject Sorghum en_US
dc.subject Cowpea en_US
dc.subject Food Fortification en_US
dc.subject Food sensory analysis en_US
dc.subject Tannins en_US
dc.title Evaluation of the functional quality of cowpea-fortified traditional African sorghum foods using instrumental and descriptive sensory analysis en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record