The significance of African lions for the financial viability of trophy hunting and the maintenance of wild land

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lindsey, Peter Andrew
dc.contributor.author Balme, Guy Andrew
dc.contributor.author Booth, Vernon Richard
dc.contributor.author Midlane, Neil
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-16T06:46:24Z
dc.date.available 2012-05-16T06:46:24Z
dc.date.issued 2012-01-11
dc.description.abstract Recent studies indicate that trophy hunting is impacting negatively on some lion populations, notably in Tanzania. In 2004 there was a proposal to list lions on CITES Appendix I and in 2011 animal-welfare groups petitioned the United States government to list lions as endangered under their Endangered Species Act. Such listings would likely curtail the trophy hunting of lions by limiting the import of lion trophies. Concurrent efforts are underway to encourage the European Union to ban lion trophy imports. We assessed the significance of lions to the financial viability of trophy hunting across five countries to help determine the financial impact and advisability of the proposed trade restrictions. Lion hunts attract the highest mean prices (US$24,000–US$71,000) of all trophy species. Lions generate 5–17% of gross trophy hunting income on national levels, the proportional significance highest in Mozambique, Tanzania, and Zambia. If lion hunting was effectively precluded, trophy hunting could potentially become financially unviable across at least 59,538 km2 that could result in a concomitant loss of habitat. However, the loss of lion hunting could have other potentially broader negative impacts including reduction of competitiveness of wildlife-based land uses relative to ecologically unfavourable alternatives. Restrictions on lion hunting may also reduce tolerance for the species among communities where local people benefit from trophy hunting, and may reduce funds available for anti-poaching. If lion off-takes were reduced to recommended maximums (0.5/1000 km2), the loss of viability and reduction in profitability would be much lower than if lion hunting was stopped altogether (7,005 km2). We recommend that interventions focus on reducing off-takes to sustainable levels, implementing age-based regulations and improving governance of trophy hunting. Such measures could ensure sustainability, while retaining incentives for the conservation of lions and their habitat from hunting. en
dc.description.librarian ab2012 en
dc.description.sponsorship Panthera (http://www.panthera.org/?splash=off) Grant number: 016682-0002-02521-NY02.2532753.2. en
dc.description.uri http://www.plosone.org en
dc.identifier.citation Lindsey PA, Balme GA, Booth VR, Midlane N (2012) The Significance of African Lions for the Financial Viability of Trophy Hunting and the Maintenance of Wild Land. PLoS ONE 7(1): e29332. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029332 en
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0029332
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18740
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en
dc.rights © 2012 Lindsey et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. en
dc.subject Trophy hunting en
dc.subject Financial viability en
dc.subject Maintenance of wild land en
dc.subject African lion (Panthera leo)
dc.subject.lcsh Lion -- Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Trophy industry -- Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Predator hunting -- Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Wilderness areas -- Africa en
dc.title The significance of African lions for the financial viability of trophy hunting and the maintenance of wild land en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record