Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author De Villiers, Wium P.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-25T06:32:14Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-25T06:32:14Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.description.abstract Many jurisdictions including the member states of the European Union, the United States of America, Canada, England and South Africa provide for legal professional privilege. These jurisdictions share a common rationale with regard to the protection of communications between lawyer and client. The rationale recognises the nature of the legal profession and its contribution to the rule of law and applies to both criminal and civil law. en
dc.description.uri http://www.jutalaw.co.za/catalogue/itemdisplay.jsp?item_id=3599 en_US
dc.identifier.citation De Villiers, W 2011, 'Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law?', South African Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 42-51. en
dc.identifier.issn 1011-8627
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17161
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Juta Law en_US
dc.rights Juta Law en
dc.subject Legal professional privilege en
dc.subject Common rationale en
dc.subject.lcsh Jurisdiction (International law) en
dc.subject.lcsh Universal jurisdiction en
dc.subject.lcsh Attorney and client -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Practice of law -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Criminal law -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Lawyers -- South Africa -- Protection en
dc.title Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law? en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record