Jordan v Farber (1352/09) [2009] ZANCHC 81 (15/12/2009)

Barnard, Jacolien; Nagel, C.J. (Christoffel Johannes), 1954-

dc.contributor.author	Barnard, Jacolien
dc.contributor.author	Nagel, C.J. (Christoffel Johannes), 1954-
dc.date.accessioned	2011-03-30T08:01:17Z
dc.date.available	2011-03-30T08:01:17Z
dc.date.issued	2010-12
dc.description.abstract	This case deals with several aspects of the general principles of contract, the influence of the constitutional values of dignity and equality as regards public policy on the validity of contracts, error, cancellation of contracts and the unethical conduct of an attorney who found himself in a conflict of interests situation. The matter was brought by way of application. This is probably the reason that not all possible remedies available to the applicants were properly explored or ventilated. Although the outcome of the case is probably correct, one cannot help but feel that the applicants were afforded minimum justice in the circumstances of the case.	en
dc.identifier.citation	Barnard, J & Nagel, C 2010, 'Jordan v Farber (1352/09) [2009] ZANCHC 81 (15/12/2009)', Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 449/508-466/508. [http://www.puk.ac.za/fakulteite/regte/per/index.html]	en
dc.identifier.issn	1727-3781
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16142
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Faculty of Law, North West University	en_US
dc.rights	Faculty of Law, North West University	en_US
dc.subject.lcsh	Contracts -- Interpretation and construction	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Attorney and client	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Constitutional conventions -- Rules and practice	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Justice, Administration of	en
dc.title	Jordan v Farber (1352/09) [2009] ZANCHC 81 (15/12/2009)	en
dc.type	Article	en