Raamwerk vir interkulturele en interdissiplinere perspektiewe op kunsgeskiedenis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Heidema, Johannes
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-03T11:54:23Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-03T11:54:23Z
dc.date.created 2011
dc.date.issued 1987-06
dc.description Article digitised using: Suprascan 1000 RGB scanner, scanned at 400 dpi; 24-bit colour; 100% Image derivating - Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS3 - Image levels, crop, deskew Abbyy Fine Reader No.9 - Image manipulation + OCR Adobe Acrobat 9 (PDF) en_US
dc.description.abstract Uitgaande van twee universele dimensies van die bestaan, naamlik individualiteit en gemeenskaplikheid, word 'n strukturele model van die bestaan van enige entiteit geponeer. Deur die model op die bestaan van 'n werk as betekenisdraer toe te pas, word 'n strukturele model van betekenis verkry, wat vier gelykwaardige en samehangende aspekte van betekenis artikuleer: as betekenisdraer is 'n werk tegelykertyd teken, indruk, uitdrukking en matrys. In 'n spesifieke werk of kultuur se realisering van die algemene betekenisstruktuur, kan die vier pole differensieel klem ontvang, waarmee 'n raamwerk voorsien is om hermeneuties die betekenisprofiele van werke, oeuvres, style, tydperke en kulture te ondersoek deur achronies, sinchronies, diachronies en vergelykend te werk te gaan. Die raamwerk vir denke oor bestaan en oor beteken open ook interdissiplinere perspektiewe op Kunsgeskiedenis, aangesien dit 'n aantal interdissiplinere modelle wat hul waarde vir die Kunsgeskiedenis reeds bewys het, gevoeglik kan akkommodeer, o.a. deur hulle so te artikuleer dat hul strukturele kongruensie met die raamwerk en met mekaar duidelik relief kry. af
dc.description.abstract Starting out from two universal dimensions of existence, namely individuality and communality, a structural model of the existence of any entity is propounded. By applying the model to the significative existence of work, a structural model of meaning is extracted which articulates four equipollent and interrelated aspects of meaning: by having meaning, a work is at the same time sign, impression, expression and matrix. When a specific work or culture realizes this universal structure of meaning, these four aspects may receive differential emphasis. This fact renders a framework for the hermeneutic investigation of the meaning profiles of works, oeuvres, styles, periods and cultures by making achronic, synchronic, diachronic and comparative analyses. The framework for the study of existence and meaning also opens interdisciplinary perspectives on Art History, as it can readily accommodate a number of interdisciplinary models of proven value for Art History by articulating them in such a way that their structural congruence to the framework and to each other becomes obvious. en_US
dc.format.extent 13 pages en_US
dc.identifier.citation Heidema, J 1987, 'Raamwerk vir interkulturele en interdissiplinere perspektiewe op kunsgeskiedenis,' South African Journal of Art History, vol. 2, issue 3&4, pp. 43-54. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0258-3542
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15961
dc.language.iso Afrikaans af
dc.publisher Art Historical Work Group of South Africa en_US
dc.rights Art Historical Work Group of South Africa en_US
dc.subject Individuality en_US
dc.subject Communality en_US
dc.subject Art history en_US
dc.subject Hermeneutic investigation en_US
dc.subject Individualiteit af
dc.subject Gemeenskaplikheid af
dc.subject Hermeneutiese ondersoek af
dc.subject Kunsgeskiedenis af
dc.subject.lcsh Art -- History en
dc.subject.lcsh Art -- Research en
dc.subject.lcsh Hermeneutics en
dc.subject.lcsh Individuality en
dc.title Raamwerk vir interkulturele en interdissiplinere perspektiewe op kunsgeskiedenis en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record