Latin diagnoses : an unnecessary impediment - a response to Jorgensen

Figueiredo, Estrela; Moore, Gerry; Smith, G.F. (Gideon Francois), 1959-

dc.contributor.author	Figueiredo, Estrela
dc.contributor.author	Moore, Gerry
dc.contributor.author	Smith, G.F. (Gideon Francois), 1959-
dc.date.accessioned	2011-01-11T06:31:51Z
dc.date.available	2011-01-11T06:31:51Z
dc.date.issued	2010-10
dc.description.abstract	We conclude that the arguments put forward by Jørgensen in his response to our recent proposal to abandon botanical Latin as the mandatory language in which to provide a description or diagnosis when a new species is described, in fact serve to confirm that this requirement must now be removed from the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.	en
dc.identifier.citation	Figueiredo, E, Moore, G & Smith, GF 2010, 'Latin diagnoses : an unnecessary impediment - a response to Jorgensen', Taxon, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1565–1566. [http://www.botanik.univie.ac.at/iapt/s_taxon.php]	en
dc.identifier.issn	0040-0262
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15600
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	International Association for Plant Taxonomy	en_US
dc.rights	© 2010 by International Association for Plant Taxonomy	en
dc.subject	Botanical Latin	en
dc.subject	Botanical nomenclature	en
dc.subject	International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 2006	en
dc.subject	Jørgensen, P.M. 2010. Latin diagnosis. Taxon 59: 1196.	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Plants -- Nomenclature	en
dc.title	Latin diagnoses : an unnecessary impediment - a response to Jorgensen	en
dc.type	Article	en