Reading 'Bel and the Dragon' as narrative : a comparison between the Old Greek and Theodotion

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van der Bergh, Ronald Henry
dc.date.accessioned 2010-08-31T09:23:48Z
dc.date.available 2010-08-31T09:23:48Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.description.abstract Narrative theory, especially as it pertains to biblical narrative, is in a nebulous state. This article points out the enduring importance of narrative criticism for biblical narrative by way of a comparison between the two extant versions of the ancient narrative of Bel and the Dragon. By using an eclectic model of narrative theory, three traditional focal points of narratology (time, character and space) are compared. In comparing these aspects of the two versions, certain emphases of each come to light, clearly showing the benefits of reading biblical narrative as narrative. en
dc.identifier.citation Van der Bergh, RH 2009, 'Reading 'Bel and the Dragon' as narrative : a comparison between the Old Greek and Theodotion', Acta Patristica et Byzantina, vol. 20, pp. 310–323. [http://journals.sabinet.co.za/ej/ejour_patris.html] en
dc.identifier.issn 1022–6486
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/14767
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Ancient Languages, University of Pretoria en_US
dc.rights © Unisa Press en_US
dc.subject Biblical narratological studies en
dc.subject Ancient narratives en
dc.subject.lcsh Bible -- Criticism, Narrative en
dc.subject.lcsh Bible -- O.T. -- Apocrypha -- Bel and the Dragon en
dc.subject.lcsh Narration in the Bible en
dc.subject.lcsh Bible -- Comparative studies en
dc.title Reading 'Bel and the Dragon' as narrative : a comparison between the Old Greek and Theodotion en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record