How effective are standard form construction contracts in dealing with contractors' claims

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Cruywagen, J.H.H.
dc.contributor.author Croeser, Edeltraut
dc.contributor.other University of Pretoria. Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology. Dept. of Construction Economics
dc.date.accessioned 2010-07-13T09:09:00Z
dc.date.available 2010-07-13T09:09:00Z
dc.date.created 2010-07-12
dc.date.issued 2010-07-13T09:09:00Z
dc.description Thesis (BSc. (Hons)(Construction Economics))--University of Pretoria, 2009. en_US
dc.description.abstract Construction disputes between clients and contractors usually arise when contractors claim additional expenses caused by delays, variation orders, and extra work, among others. The objective of this treatise is to investigate how effective the four accepted standard form construction contracts in the South African construction industry (i.e. JBCC PBA; NEC 1, 2/3; GCC and FIDIC) are in dealing with contract variations and contractors' claims by comparing the type of provisions they provide the contracting parties, supplemented with information from guidance textbooks dealing with the various standard form construction contracts and textbooks on construction claims. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/14441
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights University of Pretoria en_US
dc.subject Mini-dissertations (Construction Economics) en_US
dc.subject Quantity surveying en
dc.subject.lcsh Construction contracts -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Construction industry -- South Africa -- Management en
dc.title How effective are standard form construction contracts in dealing with contractors' claims en_US
dc.type Text en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record