The open-door approach to locus standi by the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights in respect of its non-state complaints procedure: in need of reform?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Matusse, Angelo
dc.contributor.postgraduate Hamidu, Mariam
dc.date.accessioned 2006-11-30T11:36:21Z
dc.date.available 2006-11-30T11:36:21Z
dc.date.created 06-Oct
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.description Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2006.
dc.description Prepared under the supervision of Mr. Angelo Matusse at the Faculty of Law, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique en
dc.description.abstract "The question of locus standi regarding the non-state complaints procedure before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (the Commission) is a very flexibile one. Although the language of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (the Charter), the enabling powers and functions of the Commission, does not provide for such broad standing, the Commission has over its 20 years of operation, given broad interpretation to the question of standing by adopting the actio popularis doctrine. As a reslut the Commission has entertained communicatons from any person, group of persons or non-governmental organisation (NGOs), whether on their own behalf or on behalf of tothers. The location or nationality of such persons is also not a bar to standing. Consequently, the Commission has accepted communications from national NGOs operating in the country of the state party against whom the complaint is made, NGOs with a regaional focus, international NGOs, and non-African nationals. ... The study has five chapters. Chapter one introduces the study and the justification thereof. Chapter two explores the origin, nature and application of locus standi in domestic legal systems with particluar respect to private protection of public rights and human rights protection using Ghana, Mozambique and South Africa as case studies. Chapter three examines the standing requirements before other regional human rights protection systems namely the ECHR, and the IACHR as well as global human rights protection mechanisms throught the lens of the HRC, the CERD-Committee, the CAT-Committee and the CEDAW-Committee. Chapter four traces and assesses the development of the broad standing requirements before the Commission regarding its non-state communications procedure and the problems associated with them. And Chapter five presents the conclusions and recommendations of the study." -- Introduction. en
dc.description.degree LLM
dc.description.department Centre for Human Rights
dc.description.uri http://www.chr.up.ac.za/academic_pro/llm1/dissertations.html en
dc.format.extent 344117 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Hamidu, M 2006, The open-door approach to locus standi by the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights in respect of its non-state complaints procedure: in need of reform?, LLM Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/1213>
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/1213
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.relation.ispartofseries LLM Dissertations en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2006(8) en
dc.rights Centre for Human Rights, Law Faculty, University of Pretoria en
dc.subject UCTD
dc.subject Locus standi en
dc.subject Legal standing en
dc.subject Right to appear in court en
dc.subject Human rights en
dc.subject Non-state actors en
dc.subject Non-governmental organisation (NGO) en
dc.subject African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights en
dc.title The open-door approach to locus standi by the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights in respect of its non-state complaints procedure: in need of reform? en
dc.type Mini Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record