Prosecution of genocide at international and national courts: a comparative analysis of approaches by ICTY/ICTR and Ethiopia/Rwanda

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Onoria, Henry
dc.contributor.postgraduate Hailegebriel, Debebe
dc.date.accessioned 2006-11-13T08:46:40Z
dc.date.available 2006-11-13T08:46:40Z
dc.date.created 03-Oct
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.description Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2003.
dc.description Prepared under the supervision of Dr. Henry Onoria at the Faculty of Law, Makerere University, Kampala en
dc.description.abstract "This paper deals with the prosecution of a crime of crimes, genocide, at international and national levels. The international community has shown interest in penalizing perpetrators of gross human rights violations since the Nuremberg trial, and then the adoption of the 1948 UN Genocide Convention. After these times, significant numbers of international tribunals, although at an ad hoc level, have been established to punish gross violations of human rights including the crime of genocide. Along with these tribunals, quite a number of national courts have engaged in the prosecution of genocide. Nevertheless, due to legal and practical problems, the two legal systems are adopting different approaches to handle the matter, although the crime is one and the same. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to assess critically where the difference lies, the cause and impact of the disparity on the rights of the accused to fair trial. Moreover, the study will posit some recommendations that might assist to ameliorate this intermittent situation." -- Synopsis. "This work consists of five chapters. Chapter one is addressing the general introduction of the work, and it has already been discussed. Chapter two deals with the crime of genocide and its criminal responsibility as indicated under different national and international laws. The third chapter is devoted to focus on the right to fair trial and the prosecution of genocide, and specifically addresses the issues of the right to legal assistance, speedy trial, obtain and examine evidence, and sentencing. In chapter four the role of the Rome Statue in protecting the rights of the accused, its impact on on national laws, the complementarities of the International Criminal Court and national courts will be discussed. Finally, the work will come to an end by giving concluding remarks and recommendations under the fifth chapter." -- Introduction. en
dc.description.degree LLM
dc.description.department Centre for Human Rights
dc.description.uri http://www.chr.up.ac.za/academic_pro/llm1/dissertations.html en
dc.format.extent 348363 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation Hailegebriel, D 2003, Prosecution of genocide at international and national courts: a comparative analysis of approaches by ICTY/ICTR and Ethiopia/Rwanda, LLM Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/1072>
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/1072
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.relation.ispartofseries LLM Dissertations en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2003(23) en
dc.rights Centre for Human Rights, Law Faculty, University of Pretoria en
dc.subject UCTD
dc.subject Genocide en
dc.subject International courts en
dc.subject International Criminal Court en
dc.subject International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda en
dc.subject International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia en
dc.subject National courts en
dc.subject Right to a fair trial en
dc.subject Human rights en
dc.title Prosecution of genocide at international and national courts: a comparative analysis of approaches by ICTY/ICTR and Ethiopia/Rwanda en
dc.type Mini Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record