Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
2021; 9: e12176.
Published online 2021 Oct 6. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12176
PMCID: PMC8501999
PMID: 34707927

The soil microbiomics of intact, degraded and partially-restored semi-arid succulent thicket (Albany Subtropical Thicket)

Academic Editor: Pedro Silva

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
Supplemental Information 1: Evidence of long-term degradation of the Sundays Arid Thicket (Albany Subtropical Thicket biome) on the slopes of the study site. Aerial images show that this degraded state has been in effect for at least 60 years: (A) satellite image from 2020 (Map data: ©2021 Google Earth, Maxar Technologies), (B) aerial photo taken in 1961 by the South African Chief Directorate of National Geo-spatial information (Reproduced under Government’s Printer Authorisation [Authorisation No. 11851 dated 08 September 2021]). Ground-based repeat photography demonstrates the loss of the majority of remaining trees since 1986: photos taken in (C) 2016 and (D) 1986 (Photo credit: MT Hoffman). Note that, in (C) and (D), the area in this study is not in the area photographed (it is off to the right).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2: Trends lines of soil relative humidity and temperature. Trend lines of soil relative humidity (blue) and temperature (red) over (A–C) the full duration of measurements or (D–F) the daily average. The pale points show the individual measurements and the grey border around the trend lines depicts the 95% confidence interval.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3: Comparison of soil temperature between the different vegetation types. (A) Boxplots of data points from three iButtons per zone. Significant differences were determined using the Wilcox test. (B) Mean daily maximum (solid lines) and minimum (dashed lines) temperature over the three zones. (C) Daily difference between the mean temperatures shown in (B).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4: Comparison of soil relative humidity between the different vegetation types. Boxplots of data points from three iButtons per zone (A). Significant differences were determined using the Wilcox test. Mean daily maximum (solid lines) and minimum (dashed lines) relative humidity over the three zones (B). Daily difference between the mean relative humidities shown in B (C).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-4
Supplemental Information 5: Alpha diversity of samples as the number of (A) observed ASVs or (B) Shannon index. Significance was determined using the Wilcox test.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-5
Supplemental Information 6: Heatmap of samples using weighted Jaccard distance. Overall the samples show low levels of similarity to one another.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-6
Supplemental Information 7: Genus-level differences between zones. Relative abundance of genus-level ASVs that account for ≥1% of the reads in the different zones. Significance was determined using the Wilcox test.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-7
Supplemental Information 8: Network taxa with significantly different abundances in intact vs degraded zones. Genus-level ASVs used in the network construction are displayed with the name of the genus, if available, and show the relative abundance in both the intact and degraded zones. Each genus is coloured according to the clustering in the degraded network (Fig. 5). Significance was determined using the Wilcox test and only the genera which had significant differences between their abundance in the different zones are shown.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-8
Supplemental Information 9: Succulent thicket metadata.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-9
Supplemental Information 10: Summary statistics of iButton measurements in the succulent thicket.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-10
Supplemental Information 11: Core bacterial community of the succulent thicket.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-11
Supplemental Information 12: Core bacterial community of the intact succulent thicket.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-12
Supplemental Information 13: Core bacterial community of the degraded succulent thicket.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-13
Supplemental Information 14: Core bacterial community of the restored succulent thicket.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-14
Supplemental Information 15: Unique core bacterial community members of different vegetation conditions in the succulent thicket.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-15
Supplemental Information 16: The number of unique to near-unique ASVs detected in the intact and degraded zone according to the prevalence threshold within and out of the specific zone. Prevalence thresholds are given both as a percentage (%) and as the equivalent number of sites (n) in the intact and degraded zones. The thresholds and resultant ASV counts analysed in this study are shown in bold
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12176/supp-16
Data Availability Statement

Abstract

This study examines the soil bacterial diversity in the Portulacaria afra-dominated succulent thicket vegetation of the Albany Subtropical Thicket biome; this biome is endemic to South Africa. The aim of the study was to compare the soil microbiomes between intact and degraded zones in the succulent thicket and identify environmental factors which could explain the community compositions. Bacterial diversity, using 16S amplicon sequencing, and soil physicochemistry were compared across three zones: intact (undisturbed and vegetated), degraded (near complete removal of vegetation due to browsing) and restored (a previously degraded area which was replanted approximately 11 years before sampling). Amplicon Sequence Variant (ASV) richness was similar across the three zones, however, the bacterial community composition and soil physicochemistry differed across the intact and degraded zones. We identified, via correlation, the potential drivers of microbial community composition as soil density, pH and the ratio of Ca to Mg. The restored zone was intermediate between the intact and degraded zones. The differences in the microbial communities appeared to be driven by the presence of plants, with plant-associated taxa more common in the intact zone. The dominant taxa in the degraded zone were cosmopolitan organisms, that have been reported globally in a wide variety of habitats. This study provides baseline information on the changes of the soil bacterial community of a spatially restricted and threatened biome. It also provides a starting point for further studies on community composition and function concerning the restoration of degraded succulent thicket ecosystems.

Keywords: Soil, Succulent thicket, Albany Subtropical Thicket, Microbial ecology, Ecosystem restoration, Portulacaria afra

Introduction

The Albany Subtropical Thicket is a biome unique to South Africa that possesses a rich floristic diversity (); it consists of various forms of closed canopy shrubland, less than three meters in average canopy height, that grade into forest above ~800 mm annual precipitation and into karroid shrubland below ~200 mm (). Here we focus on an arid thicket type (100–500 mm mean annual precipitation) where large succulent shrubs, particularly Portulacaria afra (commonly known as “spekboom”), dominate the canopy (). The succulent-rich thicket types have been noted for their impressive carbon storage, given the semi-arid climates in which they occur (; ). This biome predominantly occurs in the Eastern Cape region and extends into the Western Cape province, constituting 2.5% of the land area of South Africa ()—the “arid” and “valley” thicket structural types, where P. afra can be abundant, comprise over 50% of the biome (; ). The Albany Subtropical Thicket is restricted to deep, well-drained, fertile, sandy loams with the densest thickets occurring in the deepest soils (; ) and occurs in semi-arid regions where there is sufficient protection from frost and fire (, ; ).

Portulacaria afra is considered to be an ecosystem engineer in the arid and valley thicket subtypes where it is dominant (; ; ). These regions are referred to as “succulent thicket” (sensu ). This stem-succulent shrub produces an unusually large biomass for the arid environment in which it grows. This has been attributed to its ability to shift between the C3 and crassulacean acid metabolism photosynthetic pathways (; ), that likely enables it to take advantage of sporadic rainfall (), store large quantities of carbon and maintain metabolic activity during drought conditions by recycling organic acids (). Consequently, P. afra produces copious leaf litter and root biomass, generating soils with a high soil carbon content (; ; ; ) that enhances local soil fertility () and soil moisture retention (). In addition, the thick litter layer produced by P. afra improves soil moisture retention () by buffering wet and dry cycles, thus creating a favourable environment for other plant species (; ; ).

Extensive P. afra removal results in a shift to an alternative stable state, where the resulting ecosystem can be similar to that found in other regions () such as the Nama Karoo, open savanna or pseudo-savanna (; ). In degraded areas, soil organic carbon content is substantially reduced, as is water infiltration, resulting in lower water retention and increased erosion (). The reduction in soil carbon content in degraded thicket habitat can be attributed to diminished carbon input from leaf litter and roots (), capping, and loss of topsoil through erosion (). It has also been suggested that processes such as increased microbial activity from elevated soil temperatures () and increased wetting and drying cycles in exposed surface soil will increase the rate of soil organic matter mineralisation (). Degraded succulent thicket does not spontaneously regenerate even in the absence of herbivory (; ).

Approximately 60% of the Albany Subtropical Thicket biome has been severely degraded () by vegetation clearing, cutting of wood and, primarily, browsing by domestic herbivores. Only 11% of the thicket’s original range remains intact () with the rest either transformed or moderately degraded. Attempts have been made to restore the biodiversity and functionality of this ecosystem by replanting P. afra cuttings. These attempts have met with varying degrees of success; some areas have become revegetated (; ), while others have high mortality or low growth rates (average 28% survival) (). It has been suggested that soil microbial diversity plays an important role in maintaining soil microbiome stability during periods of stress and recovery () and this may be the case in intact Albany Subtropical Thicket.

The relationship between terrestrial macroorganisms and microorganisms in the soil is an important component in understanding the structure and function of any ecosystem. Microorganisms perform important ecosystem services (), including organic matter decomposition, nutrient recycling, fertility promotion and soil agglomeration (). Factors influencing soil bacterial communities include physicochemical properties, organic matter content, fertilizer treatment, land-use, water availability and climate change (; ; ; ; ; ).

Despite the potential importance of microbial communities in the establishment and maintenance of the Albany Subtropical Thicket, neither the edaphic microbiomes of this region nor the impact of P. afra removal on soil microbiome functioning has been characterised. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare the compositions of the soil microbiomes between intact (vegetated), degraded and partially-restored succulent thicket zones and identify environmental factors that could account for observed changes in the microbial community resulting from the loss and restoration of the succulent thicket vegetation.

Methods

Sample acquisition and soil analysis

The study site, of approximately 55,000 m2 (Fig. 1), was located in the Eastern Cape, South Africa (33.2977° S, 24.7461° E). Sampling was performed on 12 December 2019 along six parallel transects with approximately 50 m between sample collection sites. The study site is bisected by a fence where half of the land area is in a degraded state (due to over-browsing by domestic animals over many decades) and half is intact (largely protected from excessive browsing). Fifteen soil samples (0–5 cm depth, after removal of surface leaf litter) were collected from each of the degraded and protected areas. In addition, five samples were taken from under the canopy of P. afra plants that were planted in the degraded area (February 2009), where a 50 m by 50 m area was fenced and a range of P. afra planting treatments were trialled (as part of the large-scale restoration experiment detailed in ). Here we term these various states of thicket vegetation as the following: the intact zone, the degraded zone, and the restored zone (although the defined area was only partially restored) and a “site” is the point where soil was sampled for microbial DNA extraction and soil physicochemical analysis. Soil samples were stored on ice immediately after collection and transferred to a −40 °C freezer within six h of sampling. Frozen samples were transferred from Port Elizabeth to Pretoria on ice and transfer took less than 8 h. In Pretoria, the samples were stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is peerj-09-12176-g001.jpg
The layout and appearance of the study site.

(A) The layout of the study site as seen in Google Earth Pro. Sampling sites numbered 1–3 occur in the intact succulent thicket while sites 4–6 occur in the degraded succulent thicket. P1–P5 are in the restored zone. The side panels show photographs taken at (B + C) intact and (D + E) degraded sampling sites. See Fig. S1 for further historical imagery of the site.

For each of the vegetation conditions, three iButton data loggers (DS1923-F5# Hygrochron; iButtonLink, LLC, Whitewater, WI, USA) were placed at five cm soil depth and recorded the temperature and humidity every two h from 13 July 2020 to 6 December 2020.

Approximately 250 g of soil from each sample site was submitted to Intertek Agricultural Services for soil chemistry analysis (Intertek, Johannesburg, South Africa). The following properties were measured: soil pH (KCI), P (Bray 1/Bray 2), cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na, S) (Mehlich 3), exchangeable acidity, density, %Ca, %Mg, %K, %Na, Ca:Mg, Ca + Mg/K, texture (Clay, Silt, Sand), total organic carbon (Walkley Black), NH4-N and NO3-N.

DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Metagenomic DNA (i.e., DNA found in an environmental sample) was extracted from 0.5 g soil samples using the QIAGEN DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). The protocol was modified to include an additional step of soil agitation by two 40 s cycles of 2,500 rpm in a Powerlyzer 24 (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). We evaluated the quantity and quality of the DNA with a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and by amplifying the bacterial 16S rRNA V3–V4 region (E9F and U1510R primers) using OneTaq® Hot Start DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Metagenomic DNA was submitted to Omega Bioservices (Norcross, Georgia, United States) for sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (Forward primer: 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′, reverse primer: 5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′ ()) on an Illumina MiSeq v3 with paired-end 300 bp reads. Each sample was sequenced twice.

Data analysis

The raw DNA reads were processed in QIIME2 2020.8 (), trimming 15 bp off the start and end of the reads and denoised using DADA2 () to give amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) () which identify different bacterial sequences with single nucleotide accuracy. After processing, library sizes ranged from 36,067 reads to 116,915 reads with a mean of 87,305 reads and a median of 90,359 reads. Each ASV was assigned taxonomy by comparing the sequence to the SILVA 138.1 (; ) database of 16S rRNA gene sequences using a naive Bayes classifier.

Unless otherwise stated, all data were analysed in R 4.0.3 () using the following packages and their dependencies: Phyloseq 1.34.0 ()⁠, ggplot2 3.3.2 ()⁠, stringr 1.4.0 (), pheatmap 1.0.12 (), RcolorBrewer 1.1-2 (), vegan 2.5-6 (), gridExtra 2.3 (), NetCoMi 1.0.2.9000 (), lubridate 1.7.9.2 (), ggrepel 0.9.1 () and ggsignif 0.6.0 (). Except for alpha diversity, which was calculated on unnormalised data, all analyses used ASV data transformed for relative abundance (proportions) which have the best performance for community analysis (). Beta diversity was calculated with the quantitative Jaccard metric. The Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) used all the available ASVs but for other analyses, ASVs were agglomerated at either the phylum or genus level, as specified in the results where applicable. For the Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA), given that data were obtained from three iButtons per zone, we interpolated the available data to generate pseudomeasurements for each site. The interpolation was performed by randomly drawing each variable from a normal distribution with a mean and standard deviation appropriate for each zone. In addition, the soil physicochemical values were standardised to zero mean and unit variance. The appropriate model for the RDA was chosen by including the terms which were selected by automatic stepwise model building using the functions ordistep and ordiR2step from the R package vegan. The final model was tested and evaluated by Anova to ensure that all terms were statistically significant. The co-occurrence network was constructed with associations calculated with CCREPE (also known as ReBoot) () and called from NetCoMi with the default parameters and clustered with the default “cluster_fast_greedy” algorithm (). Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) () was used to identify the bacterial taxa that were differentially abundant between sites. We used the LEfSe implementation on the Huttenhower Lab Galaxy Server: https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/. LEfSe uses the relative abundance of the ASVs, normalised so that the ASVs counts sum to one million in each sample, applies a Kruskal-Wallis test to identify features with a significant difference between the sample sets and uses Linear Discriminant Analysis to estimate effect sizes; finally returning biomarkers where the effect size has a logarithmic score (base ten) greater than two and the p-value is less than 0.05.

The sample metadata are provided in the Supplemental Files (Table S1) and all scripts used for analysis are available on GitHub: https://github.com/jasonbosch/The-soil-microbiomics-of-intact-degraded-and-partially-restored-semi-arid-succulent-thicket.

Results and Discussion

Soil physicochemistry

This study is based on a detailed comparison of prokaryotic microbial diversity in the 0–5 cm soil horizon from two closely adjacent but substantially different habitats: an intact (a largely undisturbed and vegetated) succulent thicket zone, and a degraded zone, where decades of unsustainable browsing resulted in the near complete removal of vegetation (Fig. S1) with subsequent erosion of topsoil (with bedrock evident in places). Samples taken from a partially revegetated area (the restored zone) were also included to assess the impact of (partial) restoration on the soil after approximately a decade of P. afra planting.

The two comparative areas, the intact and degraded zones, might be expected to differ in both biotic and abiotic parameters due to the widely different vegetation cover of the two areas (mature succulent thicket vs a sparse herbaceous layer) (Fig. 1). Specifically, the increased litter inputs and shading in the undisturbed vegetated area is predicted to increase carbon input and moisture retention in the soil (), thereby positively impacting the soil microbial communities. By comparison, degraded areas are exposed to direct sunlight and wind; both of which are predicted to decrease water retention by increasing evapotranspiration and to negatively impact microbial communities. However, the degraded areas may also positively benefit, in highly localised patches, from the presence of domestic animals, specifically from the input of urine and faeces, which might also have an impact on the microbial communities in these zones ().

Physicochemical analyses of the three primary experimental zones (intact, degraded and restored) (Table S1) showed significant differences in several parameters and intact and degraded zone samples clustered separately when analysed via PCA (Fig. 2A). The intact succulent thicket soil samples had a significantly higher total organic carbon content than either the restored or degraded zone soils (Intact: 2.33 ± 1.00, Degraded: 0.72 ± 0.28, Restored: 1.18 ± 0.15; %; Wilcox test: Intact v Degraded: p = 7.71 × 10−5, Intact v. Restored: p = 2.27 × 10−2, Degraded v. Restored: p = 4.30 × 10−3). This can be attributed to the input of leaf litter from the vegetated cover. P. afra, the main component of succulent thicket vegetation, is known to create a carbon-rich soil environment (; ; ). The intact zone samples had the highest measured levels of Ca+ (Intact: 3,174.20 ± 1,374.18, Degraded: 2,168.87 ± 1,789.83, Restored: 1,773.20 ± 396.15; mg/kg) and the lowest pH (Intact: 5.48 ± 0.90, Degraded: 6.84 ± 0.75, Restored: 6.53 ± 0.33), phosphorous content (PBray1: Intact: 18.53 ± 6.06, Degraded: 44.07 ± 9.14, Restored: 31.60 ± 9.81; PBray2: Intact: 27.33 ± 11.29, Degraded: 71.4 ± 28.15, Restored: 52.60 ± 9.74; mg/kg) and bulk density (Intact: 0.94 ± 0.12, Degraded: 1.32 ± 0.08, Restored: 1.15 ± 0.07; g/ml). In comparison, the degraded zone soils showed the lowest Mg+2 levels (Intact: 1,038.73 ± 580.19, Degraded: 368.93 ± 180.56, Restored: 789.40 ± 187.38; mg/kg) and cation exchange capacity values (Intact: 26.42 ± 10.32, Degraded: 16.03 ± 10.95, Restored: 18.70 ± 4.12), possibly a reflection of the higher water infiltration rates in the largely unvegetated exposed soils. Unexpectedly, we did not observe significant differences in NH4–N (Intact: 51.75 ± 31.63, Degraded: 38.32 ± 7.34, Restored: 41.66 ± 6.51; mg/kg; Wilcox test: Intact v. Degraded: p = 0.74, Intact v. Restored: p = 0.55, Degraded v. Restored: p = 0.17) or NO3–N content (Intact: 32.18 ± 37.97, Degraded: 24.03 ± 16.89, Restored: 13.30 ± 7.96; mg/kg; Wilcox test: Intact v. Degraded: p = 0.59, Intact v. Restored: p = 0.30, Degraded v. Restored: p = 0.23) between samples from the different zones. These results replicate previous findings for pH and C (; ) as well as for P, silt and Mg but not for Ca and NH4-N ().

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is peerj-09-12176-g002.jpg
Comparison of the different vegetation zones through Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA).

(A) Principal Components Analysis (PCA) of the soil physicochemistry demonstrating a separation between the intact and degraded soils with restored soils overlapping with the other two zones. The variables, their relative weights and directions are shown as black arrows. The first two principal components contain 45.36% of the variation. (B) Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) using weighted Jaccard distances based on ASV composition showing that the samples from different zones group together without overlap. When grouped by zone, the PCoA explains 15.13% of the variation.

As expected, the loss of succulent thicket had a major impact on soil temperature buffering and moisture entrapment, which was reflected in significant differences of temperature (Intact: 19.73 ± 7.12, Degraded: 21.41 ± 9.45, Restored: 19.57 ± 4.95; °C; Wilcox test: Intact v. Degraded: p = 1.07 × 10−9, Intact v. Restored: p = 3.94 × 10−9, Degraded v. Restored: p = 0.02) and relative humidity (Intact: 53.18 ± 21.40, Degraded: 58.13 ± 24.83, Restored: 60.04 ± 20.73; %; Wilcox test: Intact v. Degraded: p = 2.11 × 10−10, Intact v. Restored: p = 9.32 × 10−63, Degraded v. Restored: p = 8.47 × 10−24) between the three experimental zones (Table S2 and Figs. S2S4). The degraded zone had significantly higher maximum daily temperatures than either the intact or restored zones (Intact: 34.40 ± 8.18, Degraded: 36.66 ± 8.68, Restored: 30.03 ± 7.43; °C; Wilcox test: Intact v. Degraded: p = 0.03, Intact v. Restored: p = 6.55 × 10−7, Degraded v. Restored: p = 3.21 × 10−11; Fig. S3), most likely due to the soil being directly exposed to sunlight, in agreement with observations from similarly degraded thicket landscapes (). The lower maximum soil temperatures in the restored zone compared to the intact zone (Fig. S3) may be due to greater localised canopy closure which would buffer soil temperatures.

The degraded zone originally displayed a lower daily maximum relative humidity when compared to the intact zone. Following the onset of seasonal rains, the degraded zone exhibited higher daily maximum and minimum relative humidity (Fig. S4). This is unsurprising as there is high rainfall interception in intact thicket canopy (~60% interception, amongst the highest values recorded for various vegetation types across the globe (; )) and thus smaller rainfall events have very little impact on soil moisture beneath the intact thicket canopy relative to the bare ground in the degraded zone. Secondly, the deep lens of low bulk density soil under intact thicket means that water rapidly infiltrates beyond five cm (). Thus, the soil moisture under the intact canopy was lower than in the degraded zone for small rainfall events, but water will likely be stored in the leaf litter lens after large rainfall events extending the period of water availability (). We suspect that only small (<5 mm) rainfall events occurred during the period the iButtons were deployed. The restored site lacked the deep litter lens, exhibited a layer of silt trapped from the degraded area and had a more closed canopy than the intact zone, together ensuring that soil relative humidity values were higher than in the degraded and intact zones (Fig. S4).

Biodiversity and microbial composition differences between the intact and degraded zones

Alpha-diversity analysis of the 26,759 observed ASVs revealed no significant differences in biodiversity between intact and degraded zones (Fig. S5). This was unexpected and contradicts a recent study that found higher levels of diversity in arid soils with plant cover compared to those without (). However, previous studies have disagreed whether herbivory increases () or decreases () bacterial diversity and the link between browsing and soil microbial diversity is probably very complex and may depend on both browsing intensity and the plant community species diversity and composition (). Despite the similarities in biodiversity summary statistics, microbial communities from the different zones formed distinct clusters, as indicated by the beta-diversity distances between the samples (Fig. 2B and Fig. S6). Clustering of the microbial populations for the three zones (intact, degraded and restored) captured 15.13% of the variation in the samples, with restored samples located in an intermediate position between the intact and degraded samples. Together these results suggest that vegetation loss has an impact on the community structure of the succulent thicket soil microbiome, but not on its overall biodiversity.

The core microbial community (defined as ASVs present in at least 95% (i.e., ≥33/35) of samples: Table S3) only accounted for 103 genus-level ASVs (9.87%) but comprised 70.29% of the sequence reads. If the threshold were raised to 100% (i.e., 35/35 sites), then 60 genus-level ASVs, comprising 5.75% of the total genus-level ASVs and 54.81% of the reads, would be detected but if it were lowered to 89% (i.e., 31/35 sites) then 142 genus-level ASVs comprising 13.60% of the total genus-level ASVs and 77.84% of the reads, would be detected. Each of the three sampled zones also had their own unique core communities which showed a level of similar dominance across the reads (Tables S4S6); the core community accounted for 118 ASVs (13.58% of genus-level ASVs, 74.95% of reads) in the intact zone, 166 ASVs (22.10% of genus-level ASVs, 88.43% of reads) in the degraded zone and 207 ASVs (30.49% of genus-level ASVs, 86.40% of reads) in the restored zone. If the threshold were raised to 100% (i.e., 15/15 or 5/5 sites) then the core community would consist of 78 ASVs (8.98% of genus-level ASVs and 62.75% of reads) in the intact zone and 121 ASVs (16.11% of genus-level ASVs and 80.85% of reads) in the degraded zone while the restored zone would be the same as at the standard 95% threshold. If the threshold were lowered to 89% (i.e., 13/15 or 4/5 sites) then the core community would consist of 155 ASVs (17.84% of genus-level ASVs and 81.68% of reads) in the intact zone, 189 ASVs (25.16% of genus-level ASVs and 90.77% of reads) in the degraded zone and 295 ASVs (43.45% of genus-level ASVs and 93.74% of reads) in the restored zone. The dominance of a relatively small number of taxa is a well-known phenomenon in soils (). The composite microbial community in all experimental samples comprised 36 prokaryotic phyla, the most abundant of which (based on ASV assignments of 16S rRNA gene amplicon reads) were Actinobacteriota (28.76%), Proteobacteria (21.39%), Acidobacteriota (11.40%), Plantomycetes (9.84%) and Bacteroidota (7.71%) (Fig. 3A).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is peerj-09-12176-g003.jpg
Relative abundance of bacterial taxa.

Relative abundance of (A) bacterial phyla and (B) genera. Taxa which have a relative abundance less than 1% are combined in the NA category in (A) and are completely removed in (B) for ease of viewing. The taxa displayed in (B) account for approximately 25% of the total abundance in the samples.

Significant differences were observed at the genus level between the intact and degraded zones (Fig. 3B and Fig. S7). The largest differences were observed for Rubrobacter (1.72% intact vs 6.16% degraded), Conexibacter (3.57% intact vs 0.14% degraded), RB41 (2.22% intact vs 5.02% degraded), Bryobacter (4.45% intact vs 1.82% degraded) and Mycobacterium (2.69% intact vs 0.53% degraded). ASVs with a relative abundance of less than 1% accounted for between 66.05% and 69.94% of all reads in the various zones. Soil samples from the restored zone showed a larger number of taxa classified as ‘uncultured’ than either the intact or degraded zone samples (4.06% restored vs 1.50% intact and 0.29% degraded).

In addition, LEfSe analysis identified four biomarker taxa for intact zone soils and five for degraded zone soils (Fig. 4). The intact biomarker taxa were derived from the families Acidobacteriaceae (Subgroup 1) and Myxococcaceae, the order Frankiales and the class Verrucomicrobiae. The order Frankiales is one of the most abundant in the dataset and includes many root-nodule associated taxa (; ); its over-representation in intact sites suggests that the changes in the soil microbiome may be due to the reduction or disappearance of plant-associated taxa with the loss of vegetation. By comparison, biomarker taxa for degraded zone soils were the genera Ensifer and Exiguobacterium, members of which are found in diverse environments (), the cyanobacterial family Coleofasiculaceae, the order Puniceispiralles and the Chloroflexi class Anaerolineae, commonly found in anaerobic digesters ().

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is peerj-09-12176-g004.jpg
Taxa identified as potential biomarkers.

Taxa identified as potential biomarkers according to LEfSe analysis. Only the lowest taxa in the hierarchy is displayed for a particular condition. Taxa were identified as biomarkers for (A–E) degraded vegetation, (F–I) intact vegetation or (J–P) restored vegetation. Colours represent the different zones; orange = degraded, green = intact, blue = restored.

Abiotic drivers of microbial community structure in both intact and degraded zones

In order to determine which soil physicochemical properties were potentially important for microbial community structure, we used RDA (Fig. 5). At the phylum level, the ratio of Ca to Mg and the soil density explained 47.78% of the variation in the microbial community (Fig. 5A) and, at the genus level, the ratio of Ca to Mg, the soil density and the soil pH were able to explain 50.10% of the variation in the community structure (Fig. 5B, a third axis is not plotted). pH has frequently been identified as a major driver of bacterial community composition in soils (; ). Contrary to one of the initial expectations of this study, differences in soil relative humidity and temperature resulting from the loss of vegetation did not appear to significant affect microbial community structure in the intact and degraded zones. However, the interplay of relative humidity and temperature may affect the water balance of the soil, which could potentially be responsible for the shift in pH ().

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is peerj-09-12176-g005.jpg
Redundancy analysis and associated soil physicochemistry.

On the top row are the RDA results when assessing the communities at the (A) phylum and (B) genus level. Only a limited number of taxa names are displayed to prevent label overlap. The bottom row shows box-and-whisker plots of the variables which were determined to play a significant role in the RDA; (C) pH, (D) ratio of Ca to Mg and (E) density. Significance was determined using the Wilcox test.

Unique to near-unique members of the core microbial community in each zone

To identify unique members of the common core microbial community () within each zone, genus-level ASVs were filtered using the following two criteria: the ASVs were present in >95% of the sites within a zone and in fewer than 10% of sites within the other zones (Table S7). The number of near-unique taxa in each zone were also tested at different thresholds to assess how the threshold affected the results (Table S8). The threshold for the number of sites in which an ASV had to present for a specific zone had the greatest effect on the results, while the threshold for the number of non-zone sites in which an ASV could be present only had an effect when the threshold was raised to 20% or 3/15 sites. While there were several unique core members for the restored zone, there were fewer sites for that zone and all the unique core members were at or below the mean relative abundance of detected taxa; for these reasons the unique core taxa of only the intact and degraded zone samples are discussed.

In the intact (vegetated) zone core community, two genera were unique: Acidipila-silvibacterium and Burkholderia-caballeronia-paraburkholderia. Acidipila-silvibacterium is a member of the Acidobacteriota, commonly found in soils and capable of tolerating tolerate low pHs (; ). The family Acidobacteriaceae (Subgroup 1), which contains Acidipila-silvibacterium, was also identified by LEfSe analysis as a biomarker of intact succulent thicket soil samples (Fig. 4), consistent with the lower mean pH values of these samples (Intact: pH 5.48, degraded: pH 6.84). It is likely that the presence of these taxa, almost exclusively in the vegetated soil samples, is due to the abundance of plant biomass, given that Acidipila-silvibacterium has been identified as a core operational taxonomic unit (OTU) of decaying wood () and Burkholderia-caballeronia-paraburkholderia contains many plant-associated species () which degrade cellulose () and are associated with wood-decaying fungi ().

The two unique genera identified in the degraded zone core community were an uncultured member of the order Azospirillales and the genus Arthrobacter. Both of these taxa are potentially nitrogen-fixing (; ) and Arthrobacter has been implicated in the recovery of polluted soils and soils where vegetation has been lost (; ; ).

Correlations of taxa in the intact and degraded sites

In order to understand how the structure of the microbial communities changed between intact and degraded zones, co-occurrence networks of the 50 genus-level ASVs with the highest variation in abundance were filtered from the main dataset and compared between the intact and degraded zones. The network analysis showed a marked decrease in community complexity in degraded compared with intact zone microbiomes (Fig. 6) as measured by clusters of co-occurring taxa. In the intact zone samples, ASVs were grouped in six clusters, whereas in the degraded zone samples, the same ASVs formed only two clusters. The cluster assignments were consistent, even when the number of genus-level ASVs were increased, indicating that the differences in complexity were robust for the ASVs included in the network.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is peerj-09-12176-g006.jpg
Co-occurrence network.

Co-occurrence network showing the 50 ASVs with the highest variance. Bold text indicates hub nodes and nodes of the same colour were clustered together. Blue edges indicate positive correlations and red edges indicate negative correlations between the connected nodes. The thicker the edge, the more similar the two nodes are to one another.

In the intact zone network, only positive correlations are observed within groups; surprisingly negative correlations were completely absent. This suggests that the intact zone microbial community exists in a stable state, where each cluster of taxa may occupy a distinct niche and where inter-taxon competition is minimal. In stark contrast, the degraded zone network showed very large numbers of both positive and negative correlations between the two groups (Fig. 6). A potential ecological implication of this observation is that niches in the degraded zone are largely homogenised, resulting in high levels of inter-taxon competition.

A closer examination of the 50 genus-level ASVs showed that 30 had significantly different abundances between the intact and degraded zones (Fig. S8); 15 in cluster 1 and 15 in cluster 2. Thirteen of the 15 nodes belonging to cluster 1 had higher abundance in the intact zone and 13/15 nodes belonging to cluster 2 had higher abundance in the degraded zone. The genus-level ASVs found to be higher in the intact zone generally belonged to taxa which have been reported to be plant-associated, such as Connexibacter (; ), Mycobacterium (; ), Pseudonocardia (; ; ) and Microlunatus (). We note that these plant-associated taxa were also present in the degraded zone where vegetation is largely absent. It is unclear whether their presence is due to associations with the sparse vegetation, the presence of species in the plant-associated taxon category which do not undergo obligate interactions with plants or bacteria from the intact zone being carried downhill into the degraded zone by rain water (; ).

Although there are known pitfalls in interpreting microbial co-occurrence networks (; ), we suggest that the presence of abundant vegetation (in the intact zone), and the existence of plant-and plant root-associated microbiome niches, likely underlie the observed differences in the two networks (Fig. 6). Plant-root associated niches such as the rhizoplane and rhizospheric zones provide spatial and physicochemical separation for their intrinsic microbial communities (; ; ); consistent with the well-discriminated clustering structure of the intact zone network, the limited number of inter-cluster correlations and the absence of negative correlations. Conversely, the loss of these defined niche structures in the largely unvegetated degraded zone appears to spatially homogenise the microbial community, leading to a weak clustering structure and a high level of inter-taxon competition.

The intermediate position of the restored zone

The inclusion of the restored zone, where P. afra had been allowed to regrow, provided the opportunity to evaluate the recovery of the succulent thicket after an ~11 year interval. Soil samples from the restored zone showed a microbial community that was intermediate between the intact and degraded zones (Fig. 2B). The abundances of some taxa in the restored zone samples were also intermediate between those in the intact and degraded zone samples: e.g., Rubrobacter (Fig. S7). Similarly, a PCA of soil physicochemical properties showed that the restored zone overlapped with both the intact and degraded zones, while the latter two showed no overlap (Fig. 2A). In addition, soil physicochemical properties such as the amount of carbon and soil density (Fig. 5), both mediated by the presence of P. afra, were positioned at levels between those of the intact and degraded zones. However, for several other properties, the restored zone samples showed no statistically significant difference from those of the intact or degraded zone. This may indicate that different properties recover at different rates, but may also be due to stochastic variations between sites.

Taken together, these data suggest that the restored zone soils exist in an intermediate state between the intact and degraded zone soils. The obvious implication is that the planting of P. afra in degraded zones, as the basis of the restoration program, has resulted in a shift in both the soil properties and microbial communities, from the degraded state to more closely resemble the intact zone. To gain a full understanding of the process of restoration, multiple independent restoration attempts should be established in conjunction with regular, long-term monitoring in order to follow microbial succession () and distinguish between determined and stochastic events (). Understanding the temporal nature of community development, together with identification of the functionally important microbial species, would be an important aid to future restoration efforts (; ).

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1

Evidence of long-term degradation of the Sundays Arid Thicket (Albany Subtropical Thicket biome) on the slopes of the study site.

Aerial images show that this degraded state has been in effect for at least 60 years: (A) satellite image from 2020 (Map data: ©2021 Google Earth, Maxar Technologies), (B) aerial photo taken in 1961 by the South African Chief Directorate of National Geo-spatial information (Reproduced under Government’s Printer Authorisation [Authorisation No. 11851 dated 08 September 2021]). Ground-based repeat photography demonstrates the loss of the majority of remaining trees since 1986: photos taken in (C) 2016 and (D) 1986 (Photo credit: MT Hoffman). Note that, in (C) and (D), the area in this study is not in the area photographed (it is off to the right).

Supplemental Information 2

Trends lines of soil relative humidity and temperature.

Trend lines of soil relative humidity (blue) and temperature (red) over (A–C) the full duration of measurements or (D–F) the daily average. The pale points show the individual measurements and the grey border around the trend lines depicts the 95% confidence interval.

Supplemental Information 3

Comparison of soil temperature between the different vegetation types.

(A) Boxplots of data points from three iButtons per zone. Significant differences were determined using the Wilcox test. (B) Mean daily maximum (solid lines) and minimum (dashed lines) temperature over the three zones. (C) Daily difference between the mean temperatures shown in (B).

Supplemental Information 4

Comparison of soil relative humidity between the different vegetation types.

Boxplots of data points from three iButtons per zone (A). Significant differences were determined using the Wilcox test. Mean daily maximum (solid lines) and minimum (dashed lines) relative humidity over the three zones (B). Daily difference between the mean relative humidities shown in B (C).

Supplemental Information 5

Alpha diversity of samples as the number of (A) observed ASVs or (B) Shannon index.

Significance was determined using the Wilcox test.

Supplemental Information 6

Heatmap of samples using weighted Jaccard distance.

Overall the samples show low levels of similarity to one another.

Supplemental Information 7

Genus-level differences between zones.

Relative abundance of genus-level ASVs that account for ≥1% of the reads in the different zones. Significance was determined using the Wilcox test.

Supplemental Information 8

Network taxa with significantly different abundances in intact vs degraded zones.

Genus-level ASVs used in the network construction are displayed with the name of the genus, if available, and show the relative abundance in both the intact and degraded zones. Each genus is coloured according to the clustering in the degraded network (Fig. 5). Significance was determined using the Wilcox test and only the genera which had significant differences between their abundance in the different zones are shown.

Supplemental Information 9

Succulent thicket metadata.

Supplemental Information 10

Summary statistics of iButton measurements in the succulent thicket.

Supplemental Information 11

Core bacterial community of the succulent thicket.

Supplemental Information 12

Core bacterial community of the intact succulent thicket.

Supplemental Information 13

Core bacterial community of the degraded succulent thicket.

Supplemental Information 14

Core bacterial community of the restored succulent thicket.

Supplemental Information 15

Unique core bacterial community members of different vegetation conditions in the succulent thicket.

Supplemental Information 16

The number of unique to near-unique ASVs detected in the intact and degraded zone according to the prevalence threshold within and out of the specific zone.

Prevalence thresholds are given both as a percentage (%) and as the equivalent number of sites (n) in the intact and degraded zones. The thresholds and resultant ASV counts analysed in this study are shown in bold

Acknowledgments

The research presented here was part of a BSc (Hons) thesis (MS). We wish to thank Timm Hoffman for providing repeat photographs of the study site (used in Fig. S1).

Funding Statement

Jason Bosch and Jenny Johnson were supported by postdoctoral bursary funding from the University of Pretoria and Pedro Lebre was supported by senior postdoctoral bursary funding from the University of Pretoria. This work is based on research supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant number: 119379; Alastair J. Potts) and the Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries: Natural Resource Management Programme (Robbert Duker; Alastair J. Potts). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Alastair Potts is an Academic Editor for PeerJ and Don A. Cowan is a former member of the PeerJ Editorial Board.

Author Contributions

Micaela Schagen performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Jason Bosch performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Jenny Johnson performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Robbert Duker performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Pedro Lebre performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Alastair J. Potts conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Don A. Cowan conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

No permit needed.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The raw sequencing data is available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA): BioProject PRJNA735914.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The iButton data is available at Zenodo: Cowan, Donald, Potts, Alastair, & Duker, Robbert. (2021). Thicket State Soil Temperature and Humidity Dataset: Thicket Soil Microbiome Project [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4916017.

All scripts used for analysis are available at GitHub: https://github.com/jasonbosch/The-soil-microbiomics-of-intact-degraded-and-partially-restored-semi-arid-succulent-thicket.

References

Abu-Ashour & Lee (2000) Abu-Ashour J, Lee H. Transport of bacteria on sloping soil surfaces by runoff. Environmental Toxicology. 2000;15:149–153. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1522-7278. [CrossRef] []
Ahlmann-Eltze (2019) Ahlmann-Eltze C. Ggsignif: significance brackets for ggplot2. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggsignif
Armitage & Jones (2019) Armitage DW, Jones SE. How sample heterogeneity can obscure the signal of microbial interactions. The ISME Journal. 2019;13(11):2639–2646. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0463-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Auguie (2017) Auguie B. GridExtra: miscellaneous functions for “Grid” graphics. 2017. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gridExtra
Banning et al. (2011) Banning NC, Gleeson DB, Grigg AH, Grant CD, Andersen GL, Brodie EL, Murphy DV. Soil microbial community successional patterns during forest ecosystem restoration. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011;77(17):6158–6164. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00764-11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Bardgett & van der Putten (2014) Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature. 2014;515(7528):505–511. doi: 10.1038/nature13855. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Battenberg et al. (2017) Battenberg K, Wren JA, Hillman J, Edwards J, Huang L, Berry AM. The influence of the host plant is the major ecological determinant of the presence of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiont cluster II frankia species in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2017;83(1):e02661–e026616. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02661-16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Birch (1958) Birch HF. The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant and Soil. 1958;10(1):9–31. doi: 10.1007/BF01343734. [CrossRef] []
Bolyen et al. (2019) Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koester I, Kosciolek T, Kreps J, Langille MGI, Lee J, Ley R, Liu Y-X, Loftfield E, Lozupone C, Maher M, Marotz C, Martin BD, McDonald D, McIver LJ, Melnik AV, Metcalf JL, Morgan SC, Morton JT, Naimey AT, Navas-Molina JA, Nothias LF, Orchanian SB, Pearson T, Peoples SL, Petras D, Preuss ML, Pruesse E, Rasmussen LB, Rivers A, Robeson MS, Rosenthal P, Segata N, Shaffer M, Shiffer A, Sinha R, Song SJ, Spear JR, Swafford AD, Thompson LR, Torres PJ, Trinh P, Tripathi A, Turnbaugh PJ, Ul-Hasan S, van der Hooft JJJ, Vargas F, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Vogtmann E, von Hippel M, Walters W, Wan Y, Wang M, Warren J, Weber KC, Williamson CHD, Willis AD, Xu ZZ, Zaneveld JR, Zhang Y, Zhu Q, Knight R, Caporaso JG. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37(8):852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Bouam et al. (2018) Bouam A, Armstrong N, Levasseur A, Drancourt M. Mycobacterium terramassiliense, Mycobacterium rhizamassiliense and Mycobacterium numidiamassiliense sp. nov., three new Mycobacterium simiae complex species cultured from plant roots. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):9309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27629-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Brodie, Edwards & Clipson (2002) Brodie E, Edwards S, Clipson N. Bacterial community dynamics across a floristic gradient in a temperate upland grassland ecosystem. Microbial Ecology. 2002;44(3):260–270. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-2012-1. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Caillon & Schelker (2020) Caillon F, Schelker J. Dynamic transfer of soil bacteria and dissolved organic carbon into small streams during hydrological events. Aquatic Sciences. 2020;82(2):41. doi: 10.1007/s00027-020-0714-4. [CrossRef] []
Callahan, McMurdie & Holmes (2017) Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME Journal. 2017;11(12):2639–2643. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Callahan et al. (2016) Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods. 2016;13(7):581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Carr et al. (2019) Carr A, Diener C, Baliga NS, Gibbons SM. Use and abuse of correlation analyses in microbial ecology. The ISME Journal. 2019;13(11):2647–2655. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0459-z. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Chen et al. (2009) Chen H-H, Qin S, Li J, Zhang Y-Q, Xu L-H, Jiang C-L, Kim C-J, Li W-J. Pseudonocardia endophytica sp. nov., isolated from the pharmaceutical plant Lobelia clavata. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59:559–563. [PubMed] []
Cheng et al. (2016) Cheng J, Jing G, Wei L, Jing Z. Long-term grazing exclusion effects on vegetation characteristics, soil properties and bacterial communities in the semi-arid grasslands of China. Ecological Engineering. 2016;97(5):170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.09.003. [CrossRef] []
Christofides et al. (2020) Christofides SR, Bettridge A, Farewell D, Weightman AJ, Boddy L. The influence of migratory Paraburkholderia on growth and competition of wood-decay fungi. Fungal Ecology. 2020;45(2):100937. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2020.100937. [CrossRef] []
Clauset, Newman & Moore (2004) Clauset A, Newman MEJ, Moore C. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E. 2004;70(6):066111. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Compant et al. (2008) Compant S, Nowak J, Coenye T, Clément C, Ait Barka E. Diversity and occurrence of Burkholderia spp. in the natural environment. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2008;32(4):607–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00113.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Cowling (1983) Cowling RM. Phytochorology and vegetation history in the south-eastern cape, South Africa. Journal of Biogeography. 1983;10(5):393. doi: 10.2307/2844748. [CrossRef] []
Cowling & Mills (2011) Cowling RM, Mills AJ. A preliminary assessment of rain throughfall beneath Portulacaria afra canopy in subtropical thicket and its implications for soil carbon stocks. South African Journal of Botany. 2011;77(1):236–240. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.06.004. [CrossRef] []
Cowling & Potts (2015) Cowling RM, Potts AJ. Climatic, edaphic and fire regime determinants of biome boundaries in the eastern Cape Floristic Region. South African Journal of Botany. 2015;101:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.03.182. [CrossRef] []
Cowling et al. (2005) Cowling RM, Procheş Ş, Vlok JHJ, van Staden J. On the origin of southern African subtropical thicket vegetation. South African Journal of Botany. 2005;71(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30144-7. [CrossRef] []
Dayaram et al. (2019) Dayaram A, Harris LR, Grobler BA, Van der Merwe S, Rebelo AG, Ward Powrie L, Vlok JHJ, Desmet PG, Qabaqaba M, Hlahane KM, Skowno AL. Vegetation map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland 2018: a description of changes since 2006. Bothalia. 2019;49(1):435. doi: 10.4102/abc.v49i1.2452. [CrossRef] []
Delgado-Baquerizo et al. (2018) Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio AM, Brewer TE, Benavent-González A, Eldridge DJ, Bardgett RD, Maestre FT, Singh BK, Fierer N. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science. 2018;359(6373):320–325. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Dobrovolskaya et al. (2020) Dobrovolskaya TG, Golovchenko AV, Lysak LV, Yurchenko EN. Taxonomic structure of bacterial communities of Rhizospheric soil under Bogs’ plants. Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin. 2020;75(2):93–100. doi: 10.3103/S0147687420020039. [CrossRef] []
Dong et al. (2018) Dong L, Cheng R, Xiao L, Wei F, Wei G, Xu J, Wang Y, Guo X, Chen Z, Chen S. Diversity and composition of bacterial endophytes among plant parts of Panax notoginseng. Chinese Medicine. 2018;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13020-018-0198-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Duker et al. (2015a) Duker R, Cowling RM, du Preez DR, Potts AJ. Frost, Portulacaria afra Jacq., and the boundary between the Albany subtropical thicket and Nama-Karoo biomes. South African Journal of Botany. 2015a;101:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.05.004. [CrossRef] []
Duker et al. (2015b) Duker R, Cowling RM, du Preez DR, van der Vyver ML, Weatherall-Thomas CR, Potts AJ. Community-level assessment of freezing tolerance: frost dictates the biome boundary between Albany subtropical thicket and Nama-Karoo in South Africa. Journal of Biogeography. 2015b;42(1):167–178. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12415. [CrossRef] []
Eldridge et al. (2017) Eldridge DJ, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Travers SK, Val J, Oliver I, Hamonts K, Singh BK. Competition drives the response of soil microbial diversity to increased grazing by vertebrate herbivores. Ecology. 2017;98(7):1922–1931. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1879. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Faust et al. (2012) Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D, Raes J, Huttenhower C. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLOS Computational Biology. 2012;8(7):e1002606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Fernández-González et al. (2017) Fernández-González AJ, Martínez-Hidalgo P, Cobo-Díaz JF, Villadas PJ, Martínez-Molina E, Toro N, Tringe SG, Fernández-López M. The rhizosphere microbiome of burned holm-oak: potential role of the genus Arthrobacter in the recovery of burned soils. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):6008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06112-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Garbeva et al. (2006) Garbeva P, Postma J, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD. Effect of above-ground plant species on soil microbial community structure and its impact on suppression of Rhizoctonia solani AG3. Environmental Microbiology. 2006;8(2):233–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00888.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Grayston et al. (2004) Grayston SJ, Campbell CD, Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Clegg CD, Ritz K, Griffiths BS, Rodwell JS, Edwards SJ, Davies WJ, Elston DJ, Millard P. Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques. Applied Soil Ecology. 2004;25(1):63–84. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(03)00098-2. [CrossRef] []
Grolemund & Wickham (2011) Grolemund G, Wickham H. Dates and times made easy with lubridate. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;40(3):1–25. doi: 10.18637/jss.v040.i03. [CrossRef] []
Guralnick, Rorabaugh & Hanscom (1984) Guralnick LJ, Rorabaugh PA, Hanscom Z. Influence of photoperiod and leaf age on crassulacean acid metabolism in Portulacaria afra (L.) Jacq. Plant Physiology. 1984;75(2):454–457. doi: 10.1104/pp.75.2.454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Guralnick & Ting (1987) Guralnick LJ, Ting IP. Physiological changes in Portulacaria afra (L.) Jacq. during a Summer drought and rewatering. Plant Physiology. 1987;85(2):481–486. doi: 10.1104/pp.85.2.481. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Hoare et al. (2006) Hoare DB, Mucina L, Rutherford MC, Volk JHJ, Euston-Brown DIW, Palmer AR, Powrie LW, Lechmere-Oertel RG, Proches SM, Dold AP, Ward RA. Albany thicket biome. Strelitzia. 2006;19:541–567. []
Jansson & Hofmockel (2020) Jansson JK, Hofmockel KS. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2020;18(1):35–46. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0265-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Jenkinson (1981) Jenkinson DS. The fate of plant and animal residues in soil. The Chemistry of Soil Processes; New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1981. pp. 505–561. []
Kalam et al. (2020) Kalam S, Basu A, Ahmad I, Sayyed RZ, El-Enshasy HA, Dailin DJ, Suriani NL. Recent understanding of soil acidobacteria and their ecological significance: a critical review. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:580024. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.580024. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Kasana & Pandey (2018) Kasana RC, Pandey CB. Exiguobacterium: an overview of a versatile genus with potential in industry and agriculture. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2018;38(1):141–156. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1312273. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Kielak et al. (2016) Kielak AM, Barreto CC, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA, Kuramae EE. The ecology of acidobacteria: moving beyond genes and genomes. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7(156341):1674. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00744. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Kim & Song (2014) Kim K-M, Song H-G. Revegetation of barren lakeside land through growth enhancement of Xanthium italicum by rhizobacteria. Paddy and Water Environment. 2014;12(S1):125–131. doi: 10.1007/s10333-014-0428-0. [CrossRef] []
Klindworth et al. (2013) Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(1):e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Kolde (2019) Kolde R. Pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap
Kushwaha et al. (2021) Kushwaha P, Neilson JW, Barberán A, Chen Y, Fontana CG, Butterfield BJ, Maier RM. Arid ecosystem vegetation canopy-gap dichotomy: influence on soil microbial composition and nutrient cycling functional potential. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2021;87(5):e02780–e027820. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02780-20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Lechmere-Oertel, Cowling & Kerley (2005) Lechmere-Oertel RG, Cowling RM, Kerley GIH. Landscape dysfunction and reduced spatial heterogeneity in soil resources and fertility in semi-arid succulent thicket, South Africa. Austral Ecology. 2005;30(6):615–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01495.x. [CrossRef] []
Lechmere-Oertel, Kerley & Cowling (2005) Lechmere-Oertel RG, Kerley GIH, Cowling RM. Patterns and implications of transformation in semi-arid succulent thicket, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments. 2005;62(3):459–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.11.016. [CrossRef] []
Lechmere-Oertel et al. (2008) Lechmere-Oertel RG, Kerley GIH, Mills AJ, Cowling RM. Litter dynamics across browsing-induced fenceline contrasts in succulent thicket, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany. 2008;74(4):651–659. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2008.04.002. [CrossRef] []
Li et al. (2012) Li J, Zhao G-Z, Varma A, Qin S, Xiong Z, Huang H-Y, Zhu W-Y, Zhao L-X, Xu L-H, Zhang S, Li W-J. An endophytic pseudonocardia species induces the production of artemisinin in artemisia annua. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(12):e51410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Lloyd, Berg & Palmer (2002) Lloyd J, Berg E, Palmer A. Patterns of transformation and degradation in the Thicket Biome, South Africa. Port Elizabeth: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; 2002. []
van Luijk et al. (2013) van Luijk G, Cowling RM, Riksen MJPM, Glenday J. Hydrological implications of desertification: degradation of South African semi-arid subtropical thicket. Journal of Arid Environments. 2013;91(13):14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.10.022. [CrossRef] []
Maestre, Solé & Singh (2017) Maestre FT, Solé R, Singh BK. Microbial biotechnology as a tool to restore degraded drylands. Microbial Biotechnology. 2017;10(5):1250–1253. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12832. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Marschner (2003) Marschner P. Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2003;35(3):453–461. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00297-3. [CrossRef] []
McCrackin et al. (2008) McCrackin ML, Harms TK, Grimm NB, Hall SJ, Kaye JP. Responses of soil microorganisms to resource availability in urban, desert soils. Biogeochemistry. 2008;87(2):143–155. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9173-4. [CrossRef] []
McKnight et al. (2019) McKnight DT, Huerlimann R, Bower DS, Schwarzkopf L, Alford RA, Zenger KR. Methods for normalizing microbiome data: an ecological perspective. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019;10(3):389–400. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13115. [CrossRef] []
McMurdie & Holmes (2013) McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R Package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4):e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Mills & Cowling (2006) Mills AJ, Cowling RM. Rate of carbon sequestration at two thicket restoration sites in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Restoration Ecology. 2006;14(1):38–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00103.x. [CrossRef] []
Mills & Cowling (2010) Mills AJ, Cowling RM. Below-ground carbon stocks in intact and transformed subtropical thicket landscapes in semi-arid South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments. 2010;74(1):93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.07.002. [CrossRef] []
Mills et al. (2005) Mills AJ, Cowling RM, Fey MV, Kerley GIH, Donaldson JS, Lechmere-Oertel RG, Sigwela AM, Skowno AL, Rundel P. Effects of goat pastoralism on ecosystem carbon storage in semiarid thicket, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Austral Ecology. 2005;30(7):797–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01523.x. [CrossRef] []
Mills & Fey (2004a) Mills AJ, Fey MV. Frequent fires intensify soil crusting: physicochemical feedback in the pedoderm of long-term burn experiments in South Africa. Geoderma. 2004a;121(1–2):45–64. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.10.004. [CrossRef] []
Mills & Fey (2004b) Mills A, Fey M. Transformation of thicket to savanna reduces soil quality in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Plant and Soil. 2004b;265(1–2):153–163. doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-0534-2. [CrossRef] []
Mills & Robson (2017) Mills AJ, Robson A. Survivorship of spekboom (Portulacaria afra) planted within the subtropical thicket restoration programme. South African Journal of Science. 2017;113(1/2):1–3. doi: 10.17159/sajs.2017/a0196. [CrossRef] []
Mills et al. (2014) Mills AJ, Spear D, Ndhlovu T, Knight MH, Peinke DM, Hofmeyr S, Cowling RM. Biomass of large herbivores in South African subtropical thicket. African Journal of Ecology. 2014;52(4):577–580. doi: 10.1111/aje.12162. [CrossRef] []
Mills et al. (2015) Mills A, Vyver M, Gordon I, Patwardhan A, Marais C, Blignaut J, Sigwela A, Kgope B. Prescribing innovation within a large-scale restoration programme in degraded subtropical thicket in South Africa. Forests. 2015;6(12):4328–4348. doi: 10.3390/f6114328. [CrossRef] []
Moolman & Cowling (1994) Moolman HJ, Cowling RM. The impact of elephant and goat grazing on the endemic flora of South African succulent thicket. Biological Conservation. 1994;68(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90546-0. [CrossRef] []
Morella et al. (2020) Morella NM, Weng FC-H, Joubert PM, Metcalf CJE, Lindow S, Koskella B. Successive passaging of a plant-associated microbiome reveals robust habitat and host genotype-dependent selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2020;117(2):1148–1159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908600116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Neuwirth (2014) Neuwirth E. RColorBrewer: colorbrewer palettes. 2014. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer
Ofek-Lalzar et al. (2014) Ofek-Lalzar M, Sela N, Goldman-Voronov M, Green SJ, Hadar Y, Minz D. Niche and host-associated functional signatures of the root surface microbiome. Nature Communications. 2014;5(1):4950. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5950. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Oksanen et al. (2019) Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. Vegan: community ecology package. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Pan et al. (2020) Pan L, Chen J, Ren S, Shen H, Rong B, Liu W, Yang Z. Complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium Mya-zh01, an endophytic bacterium, promotes plant growth and seed germination isolated from flower stalk of Doritaenopsis. Archives of Microbiology. 2020;202(7):1965–1976. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-01924-w. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Pawlowski & Demchenko (2012) Pawlowski K, Demchenko KN. The diversity of actinorhizal symbiosis. Protoplasma. 2012;249(4):967–979. doi: 10.1007/s00709-012-0388-4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Peschel et al. (2020) Peschel S, Müller CL, von Mutius E, Boulesteix A-L, Depner M. NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2020;22(4):bbaa290. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.15.195248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Qu et al. (2016) Qu T, Du W, Yuan X, Yang Z, Liu D, Wang D, Yu L. Impacts of grazing intensity and plant community composition on soil bacterial community diversity in a steppe grassland. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0159680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159680. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Quast et al. (2013) Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(D1):D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
R Core Team (2020) R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. []
Requena et al. (2001) Requena N, Perez-Solis E, Azcón-Aguilar C, Jeffries P, Barea J-M. Management of indigenous plant-microbe symbioses aids restoration of desertified ecosystems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001;67(2):495–498. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.495-498.2001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Risely (2020) Risely A. Applying the core microbiome to understand host-microbe systems. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2020;89(7):1549–1558. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13229. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Rousk et al. (2010) Rousk J, Bååth E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. The ISME Journal. 2010;4(10):1340–1351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.58. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Segata et al. (2011) Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology. 2011;12(6):R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Sigwela et al. (2009) Sigwela AM, Kerley GIH, Mills AJ, Cowling RM. The impact of browsing-induced degradation on the reproduction of subtropical thicket canopy shrubs and trees. South African Journal of Botany. 2009;75(2):262–267. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2008.12.001. [CrossRef] []
Slessarev et al. (2016) Slessarev EW, Lin Y, Bingham NL, Johnson JE, Dai Y, Schimel JP, Chadwick OA. Water balance creates a threshold in soil pH at the global scale. Nature. 2016;540(7634):567–569. doi: 10.1038/nature20139. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Slowikowski (2021) Slowikowski K. Ggrepel: automatically position non-overlapping text labels with ggplot2. 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggrepel
Steenhoudt & Vanderleyden (2000) Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J. Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2000;24(4):487–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00552.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Štursová et al. (2012) Štursová M, Žifčáková L, Leigh MB, Burgess R, Baldrian P. Cellulose utilization in forest litter and soil: identification of bacterial and fungal decomposers. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2012;80(3):735–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01343.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Ting & Hanscom (1977) Ting IP, Hanscom Z. Induction of acid metabolism in Portulacaria afra. Plant Physiology. 1977;59(3):511–514. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.3.511. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Tláskal et al. (2017) Tláskal V, Zrůstová P, Vrška T, Baldrian P. Bacteria associated with decomposing dead wood in a natural temperate forest. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2017;93(12):143. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix157. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Todkill, Kerley & Campbell (2006) Todkill W, Kerley G, Campbell E. Brushpiles and dung as rehabilitation patches: effect on soil resources in degraded succulent thicket, Eastern Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science. 2006;23(1):39–48. doi: 10.2989/10220110609485885. [CrossRef] []
Tuo et al. (2016) Tuo L, Li J, Liu S-W, Liu Y, Hu L, Chen L, Jiang M-G, Sun C-H. Microlunatus endophyticus sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from bark of Bruguiera sexangula. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2016;66(1):481–486. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000779. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Ulrich & Becker (2006) Ulrich A, Becker R. Soil parent material is a key determinant of the bacterial community structure in arable soils: community structure affected by soil parent material. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2006;56(3):430–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00085.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Vlok, Euston-Brown & Cowling (2003) Vlok JHJ, Euston-Brown DIW, Cowling RM. Acocks’ Valley Bushveld 50 years on: new perspectives on the delimitation, characterisation and origin of subtropical thicket vegetation. South African Journal of Botany. 2003;69(1):27–51. doi: 10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30358-6. [CrossRef] []
van der Vyver & Cowling (2019) van der Vyver ML, Cowling RM. Aboveground biomass and carbon pool estimates of Portulacaria afra (spekboom)-rich subtropical thicket with species-specific allometric models. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;448(1–3):11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.048. [CrossRef] []
van der Vyver, Mills & Cowling (2021) van der Vyver ML, Mills AJ, Cowling RM. A biome-wide experiment to assess the effects of propagule size and treatment on the survival of Portulacaria afra (spekboom) truncheons planted to restore degraded subtropical thicket of South Africa. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0250256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250256. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Wang, Xie & Hu (2013) Wang Q, Xie S, Hu R. Bioaugmentation with Arthrobacter sp. strain DAT1 for remediation of heavily atrazine-contaminated soil. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2013;77:63–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.11.003. [CrossRef] []
Wickham (2016) Wickham H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016. []
Wickham (2019) Wickham H. Stringr: simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr
Wilman et al. (2014) Wilman V, Campbell EE, Potts AJ, Cowling RM. A mismatch between germination requirements and environmental conditions: niche conservatism in xeric subtropical thicket canopy species? South African Journal of Botany. 2014;92(3):1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.12.007. [CrossRef] []
Xia et al. (2016) Xia Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Chin FYL, Zhang T. Cellular adhesiveness and cellulolytic capacity in Anaerolineae revealed by omics-based genome interpretation. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2016;9(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0524-z. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Xun et al. (2018) Xun W, Yan R, Ren Y, Jin D, Xiong W, Zhang G, Cui Z, Xin X, Zhang R. Grazing-induced microbiome alterations drive soil organic carbon turnover and productivity in meadow steppe. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0544-y. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Yilmaz et al. (2014) Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, Schweer T, Peplies J, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO. The SILVA and all-species living tree project (LTP) taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(D1):D643–D648. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1209. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Zhao et al. (2012) Zhao G-Z, Li J, Qin Y-L, Miao C-P, Wei D-Q, Zhang S, Xu L-H, Li W-J. Pseudonocardia antimicrobica sp. nov., a novel endophytic actinomycete associated with Artemisia annua L. (sweet wormwood) The Journal of Antibiotics. 2012;65(9):469–472. doi: 10.1038/ja.2012.56. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
Zhou & Ning (2017) Zhou J, Ning D. Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2017;81(4):e00002–e000017. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00002-17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc