dc.contributor.author |
Thornley, Reece
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Cook, Robin
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Spencer, Matthew
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Parr, Catherine Lucy
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Henley, Michelle
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-12-11T05:57:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-12-11T05:57:35Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-01 |
|
dc.description |
DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: Please contact the corresponding author for data access requests. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Beehive deterrents are commonly used to mitigate human–elephant conflict
and protect woody vegetation. To ensure hive activity, reduce abscondment
risks, and maintain deterrent effectiveness, resident bee colonies require
supplementary feeding during periods of low resource availability. However,
our study found that ants frequently consume the supplementary feed in open
feeders intended for bees. Anoplolepis custodiens was the most numerically
dominant species that excluded bees from the feeders, followed by Camponotus
and Crematogaster spp. With higher ant abundance, the predicted probability
of zero bees being present at feeders increased up to 82%. This competition
may undermine the efficacy of beehive deterrents as a conflict mitigation tool.
We developed a simple and effective ant exclusion method that raised the overall predicted probability of bees' presence at supplementary feeding stations
from 32% to 68%. Our findings suggest that innovative solutions to exclude ants
from supplementary feed may improve the implementation and success of this
conflict mitigation method across Africa. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Zoology and Entomology |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-12:Responsible consumption and production |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-15:Life on land |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The University of Liverpool and Elephants Alive. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/25784854 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Thornley, R., Cook, R.,
Spencer, M., Parr, C. L., & Henley, M. (2024).
Interspecific competition between ants and African
honeybees (Apis mellifera scutellata) may
undermine the effectiveness of elephant beehive–
deterrents in Africa. Conservation Science and
Practice, 6(1), e13041. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13041. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2578-4854 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1111/csp2.13041 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/99876 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Wiley |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2023 The Authors. Open Access. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Apidae |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Beehive deterrents |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Conflict mitigation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Elephants management |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Formicidae |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Human–wildlife conflict |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Insect ecology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Loxodonta africana |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-12: Responsible consumption and production |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-15: Life on land |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Honeybee (Apis mellifera) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
African elephant (Loxodonta africana) |
en_US |
dc.title |
Interspecific competition between ants and African honeybees (Apis mellifera scutellata) may undermine the effectiveness of elephant beehive–deterrents in Africa |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |