Succession of women to traditional leadership : is the judgment in Shilubana v Nwamitwa based on sound legal principles?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bekker, Jan C.
dc.contributor.author Boonzaaier, C.C. (Chris)
dc.date.accessioned 2009-05-08T12:31:13Z
dc.date.available 2009-05-08T12:31:13Z
dc.date.issued 2009-03
dc.description.abstract This note is a lego-anthropological commentary on the Constitutional Court case Shilubana v Nwamitwa 2008 (9) BCLR 914 (CC). The authors assess the judgment in the light of the essential principles and practices governing succession to traditional leadership. While they are in general agreement that women should not be excluded entirely from the office of traditional leadership, they submit that women's inclusion should be achieved by an evolutionary process rather than by rigid judicial or legislative decree. Succession by women can in fact take place within the ambit of current customary usage and law. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bekker, JC & Boonzaaier, CC 2009, 'Succession of women to traditional leadership : is the judgment in Shilubana v Nwamitwa based on sound legal principles?', Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 449-462. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0010-4051
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/9982
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Institute for Foreign and Comparaive Law, UNISA en_US
dc.rights Institute for Foreign and Comparaive Law, UNISA en_US
dc.subject Lego-anthropological en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Women -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- South Africa. en_US
dc.title Succession of women to traditional leadership : is the judgment in Shilubana v Nwamitwa based on sound legal principles? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record