dc.contributor.author |
Khogali, Rua
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bastos, Armanda D.S.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bargul, Joel L.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Getange, Dennis
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kabii, James
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Masiga, Daniel
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Villinger, Jandouwe
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-12-10T04:38:21Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-12-10T04:38:21Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-04 |
|
dc.description |
DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: The datasets presented in this study can be found in online
repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and
accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR138025-OR138032, https://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR136390-OR136395, https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR123453-OR123456,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR136355-OR136357,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR136371-OR136378,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR130207- OR130215. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND: Tick-borne pathogen (TBP) surveillance studies often use whole-tick homogenates when inferring tick-pathogen associations. However,
localized TBP infections within tick tissues (saliva, hemolymph, salivary glands,
and midgut) can inform pathogen transmission mechanisms and are key to
disentangling pathogen detection from vector competence.
METHODS: We screened 278 camel blood samples and 504 tick tissue samples
derived from 126 camel ticks sampled in two Kenyan counties (Laikipia and
Marsabit) for Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, Coxiella, Rickettsia, Theileria, and Babesia by
PCR-HRM analysis.
RESULTS: Candidatus Anaplasma camelii infections were common in camels
(91%), but absent in all samples from Rhipicephalus pulchellus, Amblyomma
gemma, Hyalomma dromedarii, and Hyalomma rufipes ticks. We detected
Ehrlichia ruminantium in all tissues of the four tick species, but Rickettsia
aeschlimannii was only found in Hy. rufipes (all tissues). Rickettsia africae was
highest in Am. gemma (62.5%), mainly in the hemolymph (45%) and less
frequently in the midgut (27.5%) and lowest in Rh. pulchellus (29.4%), where
midgut and hemolymph detection rates were 17.6% and 11.8%, respectively.
Similarly, in Hy. dromedarii, R. africae was mainly detected in the midgut (41.7%)
but was absent in the hemolymph. Rickettsia africae was not detected in Hy.
rufipes. No Coxiella, Theileria, or Babesia spp. were detected in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: The tissue-specific localization of R. africae, found mainly in the
hemolymph of Am. gemma, is congruent with the role of this tick species as its
transmission vector. Thus, occurrence of TBPs in the hemolymph could serve as a
predictor of vector competence of TBP transmission, especially in comparison to
detection rates in the midgut, from which they must cross tissue barriers to
effectively replicate and disseminate across tick tissues. Further studies should
focus on exploring the distribution of TBPs within tick tissues to enhance
knowledge of TBP epidemiology and to distinguish competent vectors from
dead-end hosts. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Veterinary Tropical Diseases |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Zoology and Entomology |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-15:Life on land |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The European Research Council (ERC)
under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation
program under grant agreement, the Swedish International
Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), the Swiss Agency for
Development and Cooperation (SDC), the Australian Centre for
International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), the Norwegian
Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), the Federal
Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and the Government of the
Republic of Kenya, the icipe ARPPIS-DAAD
scholarship and a UP post-graduate bursary. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Khogali, R., Bastos, A., Bargul, J.L., Getange, D., Kabii, J., Masiga, D. & Villinger, J.
(2024) Tissue-specific localization of tick-borne
pathogens in ticks collected from camels in
Kenya: insights into vector competence. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 14:1382228.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1382228 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2235-2988 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.3389/fcimb.2024.1382228 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/99825 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Frontiers Media |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2024 Khogali, Bastos, Bargul, Getange, Kabii,
Masiga and Villinger. This is an open-access
article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Dromedary camels |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Tick tissues |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Rhipicephalus pulchellus |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Amblyomma gemma |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Hyalomma dromedarii |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Hyalomma rufipes |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ehrlichia |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Rickettsia |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-03: Good health and well-being |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-15: Life on land |
en_US |
dc.title |
Tissue-specific localization of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from camels in Kenya : insights into vector competence |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |