dc.contributor.author |
Wagner, Josefine
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Szelei, Nikolett
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Eloff, Irma
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Acquah, Emmanuel
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-12-04T13:20:19Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-12-04T13:20:19Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-02 |
|
dc.description |
DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: The datasets presented in this article are not readily available
because the data remains under EU privacy protection policy for
research with vulnerable individuals. Requests to access the datasets
should be directed to edite.eu. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Even though receiving newcomer pupils in schools is not a new phenomenon,
many education systems grapple with finding adequate schooling arrangements
that foster belonging and inclusion. Over the years, policy-makers and school
practitioners seem to echo recurring dilemmas in terms of what language
support models may promote optimal inclusion, and whether and how to
support the language of schooling while also building on students’ cultural and
linguistic repertoires. In this article, we present classroom observations from two
Austrian primary schools that implemented German language support in two
distinct ways. School 1 implemented pull-out classes, whereas School 2 used a
model of individualized learning for all students in the mainstream classroom.
Utilizing the cultural-linguistic aspects of ‘belonging’ in pedagogical enactments,
we analyze how teachers’ instructional strategies to organize curricular learning
for newly arrived migrant pupils set conditions for pedagogies of (un)belonging
in the classroom. Findings show that pedagogies of (un)belonging seemed to
be formed via chains of patterned interactions, activities and utterances based
on three key logics: marking students’ ‘fitness’ to the mainstream classroom,
creating cultural (in)visibility, and as creating language hierarchies. While the two
classroom practices remarkably differed in how they enabled German language
learning and fitting to mainstream pedagogical norms, both seemed to uphold
monolingualism and monoculturalism. Recommendations are given in order to
expand narrow notions of belonging in educational policy and practice. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Educational Psychology |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-04:Quality Education |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-10:Reduces inequalities |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the Vice-Dean of Research, the Faculty of Teacher Education and the Department of Teacher Education and School Research of the University of Innsbruck. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Wagner, J., Szelei, N., Eloff, I. & Acquah, E. (2024) Together or separate?
Tracing classroom pedagogies of (un)belonging for newcomer migrant pupils in
two Austrian schools. Frontiers in Education 9:1301415.
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1301415. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2504-284X (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.3389/feduc.2024.1301415 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/99775 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Frontiers Media |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2024 Wagner, Szelei, Eloff and Acquah.
This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY). |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Newly arrived migrant pupils |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Classroom organization |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Language support |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Cultural and linguistic diversity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Belonging |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ethnography |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Classroom observations |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-04: Quality education |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-10: Reduced inequalities |
en_US |
dc.title |
Together or separate? Tracing classroom pedagogies of (un)belonging for newcomer migrant pupils in two Austrian schools |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |