Abstract:
Zimbabwe’s late President, R.G. Mugabe, became (in)famous for his bawdy and scurrilous
attacks on people of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) sexual orientation.
In Romans 1:26–27, Paul seems to berate and condemn homosexual relations in R.G. Mugabe’s
tone of abhorrence, describing LGBTQ activities as ‘unnatural’ and ‘unseemly’. This article
sought to investigate whether the perceived Pauline anti-homosexuality diatribe in Romans
1:26–27 endorses or negates R.G. Mugabe and Zimbabwe’s constitutionalised antihomosexuality policy. This study addressed a highly controversial, politicised and socially
sensitive sexual practice in Zimbabwe. The investigation, inter alia, revealed that both in Paul’s
Greco-Roman and Zimbabwean contexts, women are not expressly or legally included in the
anti-homosexual dictates. It also emerged that homosexual relations are older than both the
Roman 1:26–27 and R.G. Mugabe cultural milieus. The article exposed a plethora of
misunderstandings around the subject of LGBTQ+ relations and recommended down-toearth, unbiased discourses on the subject. The investigation applied a Reader Response
hermeneutical paradigm coupled with ethnographic analysis to interpret Zimbabwe’s
LGBTQ+ stance as read with Romans 1:26–27.
CONTRIBUTION: The article demonstrated the relevance of Romans 1:26–27 to the intricacies of
the LGBTQ+ sexual orientations in Zimbabwe and implications for policy making on the
subject of homosexuality.
