Hybrid metaheuristic schemes with different configurations and feedback mechanisms for optimal clustering applications

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Molokomme, Daisy Nkele
dc.contributor.author Onumanyi, Adeiza James
dc.contributor.author Abu-Mahfouz, Adnan Mohammed
dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-16T07:50:35Z
dc.date.available 2024-10-16T07:50:35Z
dc.date.issued 2024-10
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY : No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper addresses the critical gap in the understanding of the effects of various configurations and feedback mechanisms on the performance of hybrid metaheuristics (HMs) in unsupervised clustering applications. Despite the widespread use of HMs due to their ability to leverage multiple optimization methods, the lack of comprehensive studies on their configuration and feedback mechanisms effects often results in sub-optimal clustering performances and premature convergence. To tackle these issues, we introduce two algorithms for implementing eight distinct HM schemes, focusing on the impacts of parallel and serial processing models along with different feedback mechanisms. Our approach involves selecting candidate metaheuristics based on a mix of evolutionary and swarm-based methods, including the k-means algorithm, to form various HM-based clustering schemes. These schemes were then rigorously evaluated across a range of datasets and feedback mechanisms, further assessing their efficiency in the deployment of smart grid base stations. Performance analysis was based on total fitness evaluations, timing capabilities, and clustering accuracy. The results revealed that parallel HMs with decoupled feedback mechanisms performed best in terms of accuracy but at the cost of slower convergence rates as compared to serial HMs. Our findings further suggest that serial HMs will be best suited for time-sensitive applications where a compromise between speed and accuracy is acceptable, while parallel HMs with decoupled feedback mechanisms are preferable for scenarios where precision is paramount. This research significantly contributes to the field by providing a detailed analysis of HM performance in varying conditions, thereby guiding the selection of appropriate HM schemes for specific clustering tasks. en_US
dc.description.department Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). Open access funding provided by University of Pretoria. en_US
dc.description.uri http://link.springer.com/journal/10586 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Molokomme, D.N., Onumanyi, A.J. & Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. Hybrid metaheuristic schemes with different configurations and feedback mechanisms for optimal clustering applications. Cluster Computing 27, 8865–8887 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04416-4. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1386-7857 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1573-7543 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s10586-024-04416-4
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98613
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2024. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_US
dc.subject Data clustering en_US
dc.subject Edge computing en_US
dc.subject Ensemble clustering en_US
dc.subject Localization en_US
dc.subject Metaheuristics en_US
dc.subject SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure en_US
dc.title Hybrid metaheuristic schemes with different configurations and feedback mechanisms for optimal clustering applications en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record