Abstract:
This paper addresses the critical gap in the understanding of the effects of various configurations and feedback mechanisms on the performance of hybrid metaheuristics (HMs) in unsupervised clustering applications. Despite the widespread use of HMs due to their ability to leverage multiple optimization methods, the lack of comprehensive studies on their configuration and feedback mechanisms effects often results in sub-optimal clustering performances and premature convergence. To tackle these issues, we introduce two algorithms for implementing eight distinct HM schemes, focusing on the impacts of parallel and serial processing models along with different feedback mechanisms. Our approach involves selecting candidate metaheuristics based on a mix of evolutionary and swarm-based methods, including the k-means algorithm, to form various HM-based clustering schemes. These schemes were then rigorously evaluated across a range of datasets and feedback mechanisms, further assessing their efficiency in the deployment of smart grid base stations. Performance analysis was based on total fitness evaluations, timing capabilities, and clustering accuracy. The results revealed that parallel HMs with decoupled feedback mechanisms performed best in terms of accuracy but at the cost of slower convergence rates as compared to serial HMs. Our findings further suggest that serial HMs will be best suited for time-sensitive applications where a compromise between speed and accuracy is acceptable, while parallel HMs with decoupled feedback mechanisms are preferable for scenarios where precision is paramount. This research significantly contributes to the field by providing a detailed analysis of HM performance in varying conditions, thereby guiding the selection of appropriate HM schemes for specific clustering tasks.
