dc.contributor.author |
Van Dijk, Hilligje Gerritdina
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mangai, Mary S.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-10-03T09:18:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-10-03T09:18:06Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024 |
|
dc.description |
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT :
The GPSJS 2018/2019 dataset was utilised. The data is available at https://www.statssa.gov.za/ on request. Request for specific data subsets can be made, which will be considered within the bounds of ethical and legal considerations. This approach is in accordance with ethical guidelines and data protection principles, emphasising responsible and secure handling of the collected information. The questionnaire from GPSJS 2018/19 is designed according to the international standards for governance, public safety, and justice, as defined by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This research investigates the lived experiences of women in South Africa, focusing on the concept of hybrid governance and intersectional discrimination. Hybrid governance denotes a blend of modern and traditional governance structures that coexist in many post-colonial societies, including South Africa. Intersectional discrimination recognises that individuals face layers of discrimination simultaneously influenced by intersecting identities like race, gender, class, and ethnicity. This study utilised quantitative analysis and desktop research methods. The researchers employed theoretical and operational parameters to conduct a logistic regression analysis using data from the 2018/2019 Governance, Public Safety and Justice Survey (GPSJS) conducted by Statistics South Africa. The analysis aims to investigate how hybrid governance structures impact women's lives and the interconnectedness among forms of discrimination they encounter. The results shed light on the power dynamics, representation challenges, and discriminatory practices within the realm of hybrid governance. Women's experiences showcase how patriarchal norms, racial disparities, and socio-economic factors intersect to heighten discrimination levels and constrain women's autonomy. Additionally, the study emphasises the significance of recognising and addressing intersectionality as a framework for comprehending and responding to the multi-faceted challenges faced by women in South Africa.
POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS : Practitioners should appreciate the cultural diversity in South Africa and respect the varying customs and practices that come with hybrid governance. They should understand that traditional governance structures can coexist with modern ones, but also ensure that these structures do not perpetuate discriminatory practices.
Practitioners should understand that individuals may face multiple, intersecting forms of discrimination. They should therefore approach work with an intersectional lens, taking into account the ways in which factors like race, gender, and tribal affiliation can compound discrimination.
Practitioners should encourage dialogue about discrimination within the communities in which they work. They should raise awareness about what constitutes discrimination and how individuals can report it.
Practitioners should utilise available data to inform their work. They should regularly review and analyse data on discrimination to identify trends and patterns, and to inform strategies and interventions. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
School of Public Management and Administration (SPMA) |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
hj2024 |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-05:Gender equality |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-16:Peace,justice and strong institutions |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/aupa |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Van Dijk, G. & Mangai, M.S. (2024). Hybrid governance and
intersectional discrimination: An examination of women’s experiences in South Africa. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12662. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0313-6647 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1467-8500 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1111/1467-8500.12662 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98477 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Wiley |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2024 The Author(s). Australian Journal of Public Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Public Administration Australia.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Women experience |
en_US |
dc.subject |
South Africa (SA) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Perceptions |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Intersectional discrimination |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Hybrid governance |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-05: Gender equality |
en_US |
dc.title |
Hybrid governance and intersectional discrimination : an examination of women's experiences in South Africa |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |