Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Individuals with communication disabilities encounter obstacles in attaining
equal access to justice compared to others. Despite experiencing widespread violence and
abuse, they come across as challenges in seeking remedies through the legal system. One
barrier is the lack of awareness among legal practitioners regarding suitable accommodations
that would facilitate effective participation in court for individuals with communication
disabilities.
OBJECTIVES: This study explores the awareness of final-year law students concerning court
accommodations available for individuals with communication disabilities, allowing them to
testify in a South African court. The findings can serve as inspiration for expanding the current
curriculum for law students.
METHOD: This qualitative study used a modified six-step nominal group technique whereby
participants (six law students identified through snowball sampling) generated, discussed
and reached a consensus on accommodations needed by individuals with communication
disabilities, enabling them to provide testimony in court. Data were analysed using thematic
analysis principles.
RESULTS: The study found that although participants had not received any instruction on
disability rights, access to justice or court accommodations during their legal training at the
undergraduate level, they were able to perceive and learn about four main types of court
accommodations for persons with communication disabilities to enable their testimony.
CONCLUSION: Final-year law students are aware of court accommodations despite not having
received formal instruction in disability law.
CONTRIBUTION: The inclusion of disability rights and court accommodations is recommended
at the undergraduate level to ensure that when in practice, lawyers have knowledge on
ensuring access to justice for persons with communication disabilities.
Description:
DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: The data that support the findings of the study are available
upon request from the corresponding author, J.B. The data
are not publicly available because they contain sensitive
information that could potentially compromise the privacy
of the participants.