dc.contributor.author |
Getz, Wayne Marcus
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fortmann-Roe, Scott
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Cross, Paul C.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lyons, Andrew J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ryan, Sadie J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wilmers, Christopher C.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-09-18T12:08:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-09-18T12:08:35Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2007-02-14 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Parametric kernel methods currently dominate the literature regarding the construction of animal home ranges (HRs) and
utilization distributions (UDs). These methods frequently fail to capture the kinds of hard boundaries common to many natural
systems. Recently a local convex hull (LoCoH) nonparametric kernel method, which generalizes the minimum convex polygon
(MCP) method, was shown to be more appropriate than parametric kernel methods for constructing HRs and UDs, because of
its ability to identify hard boundaries (e.g., rivers, cliff edges) and convergence to the true distribution as sample size increases.
Here we extend the LoCoH in two ways: ‘‘fixed sphere-of-influence,’’ or r-LoCoH (kernels constructed from all points within
a fixed radius r of each reference point), and an ‘‘adaptive sphere-of-influence,’’ or a-LoCoH (kernels constructed from all points
within a radius a such that the distances of all points within the radius to the reference point sum to a value less than or equal
to a), and compare them to the original ‘‘fixed-number-of-points,’’ or k-LoCoH (all kernels constructed from k-1 nearest
neighbors of root points). We also compare these nonparametric LoCoH to parametric kernel methods using manufactured
data and data collected from GPS collars on African buffalo in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Our results demonstrate
that LoCoH methods are superior to parametric kernel methods in estimating areas used by animals, excluding unused areas
(holes) and, generally, in constructing UDs and HRs arising from the movement of animals influenced by hard boundaries and
irregular structures (e.g., rocky outcrops). We also demonstrate that a-LoCoH is generally superior to k- and r-LoCoH (with
software for all three methods available at http://locoh.cnr.berkeley.edu). |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Mammal Research Institute |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Zoology and Entomology |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
am2024 |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-15:Life on land |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
NSF EID and James S McDonnell Foundation Grants, and NSF Bioinformatics Postdoctoral Grands. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Getz, W.M., Fortmann-Roe, S., Cross, P.C., Lyons, A.J., Ryan, S.J. & Wilmers, C.C. (2007) LoCoH: Nonparameteric Kernel Methods for Constructing Home Ranges
and Utilization Distributions. PLoS One 2(2): e207. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0000207. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1932-6203 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1371/journal.pone.0000207 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98303 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Public Library of Science |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2007 Getz et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Parametric kernel methods |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Home ranges (HRs) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Utilization distributions (UDs) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Hard boundaries |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-15: Life on land |
en_US |
dc.title |
LoCoH : nonparameteric kernel methods for constructing home ranges and utilization distributions |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |