Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016-2018 : a cross-sectional study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gavhi, Fhatuwani
dc.contributor.author De Voux, Alex
dc.contributor.author Kuonza, Lazarus R.
dc.contributor.author Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-18T11:54:44Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-18T11:54:44Z
dc.date.issued 2023-06-23
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION : FILE S1. Manuscript data rubella database. FILE S2. Manuscript data survey database. en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Rubella is a leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. We conducted this study to evaluate the rubella surveillance system in South Africa from 2016 to 2018. The rubella surveillance system had not been evaluated since its inception; therefore, a formal evaluation is necessary to assess key attributes and to ascertain the extent to which the system achieves its objectives. METHODS : We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the usefulness, simplicity, positive predictive value, timeliness, and data quality of the rubella surveillance system from 2016 to 2018. We reviewed retrospective rubella surveillance data and conducted a survey with key stakeholders of the system. We compiled a summary report from the survey and calculated the annualized detection rate of rubella and non-rubella febrile rash, positive predictive value, the proportion of complete records, and timeliness between the surveillance steps. We compared our results with recommended performance indicators from the 2015 revised World Health Organization African regional guidelines for measles and rubella surveillance. RESULTS : The rubella surveillance system was useful but weak in terms of simplicity. The annualized detection rate of rubella febrile rash was 1.5 per 100,000 populations in 2016, 4.4 in 2017, and 2.1 in 2018. The positive predictive value was 29.1% in 2016, 40.9% in 2017, and 32.9% in 2018. The system did not meet the timeliness goal in the health facility component but met this goal in the laboratory component. The system had poor data quality, particularly in the health facility component. CONCLUSIONS : The rubella surveillance system was useful, although it was not simple to use and had low PPV, poor timeliness, and poor data quality. Efforts should be made to improve the system’s simplicity, PPV, timeliness, and data quality at the facility level. en_US
dc.description.department School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being en_US
dc.description.uri https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ en_US
dc.identifier.citation Gavhi, F., De Voux, A., Kuonza, L. & Motaze, N.V. (2023) Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016–2018: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 18(6): e0287170. https://DOI.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287170. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0287170
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98301
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.rights © 2023 Gavhi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Rubella surveillance system en_US
dc.subject Birth defects en_US
dc.subject Positive predictive value (PPV) en_US
dc.subject SDG-03: Good health and well-being en_US
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_US
dc.title Evaluation of the rubella surveillance system in South Africa, 2016-2018 : a cross-sectional study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record