Performance analysis of Bayesian optimised gradient-boosted decision trees for digital elevation model (DEM) error correction : interim results

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Okolie, Chukwuma
dc.contributor.author Adeleke, Adedayo
dc.contributor.author Smit, Julian
dc.contributor.author Mills, Jon
dc.contributor.author Ogbeta, Caleb
dc.contributor.author Maduako, Iyke
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-11T08:16:05Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-11T08:16:05Z
dc.date.issued 2024-06
dc.description Paper presented at ISPRS TC II Mid-term Symposium “The Role of Photogrammetry for a Sustainable World”, 11–14 June 2024, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. en_US
dc.description LIDAR data for the City of Cape Town was provided by the Information and Knowledge Management Department, City of Cape Town. en_US
dc.description.abstract Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), particularly when tuned with Bayesian optimisation, are powerful machine learning techniques known for their effectiveness in handling complex, non-linear data. However, the performance of these models can be significantly influenced by the characteristics of the terrain being analysed. In this study, we assess the performance of three Bayesian-optimised GBDTs (XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost) using digital elevation model (DEM) error correction as a case study. The performance of the models is investigated across five landscapes in Cape Town South Africa: urban/industrial, agricultural, mountain, peninsula and grassland/shrubland. The models were trained using a selection of datasets (elevation, terrain parameters and land cover). The comparison entailed an analysis of the model execution times, regression error metrics, and level of improvement in the corrected DEMs. Generally, the optimised models performed considerably well and demonstrated excellent predictive capability. CatBoost emerged with the best results in the level of improvement recorded in the corrected DEMs, while LightGBM was the fastest of all models in the execution time for Bayesian optimisation and model training. These findings offer valuable insights for applying machine learning and hyperparameter tuning in remote sensing. en_US
dc.description.department Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg None en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Commonwealth Scholarship Commission UK, and the University of Cape Town Postgraduate Funding Office. en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/isprs-journal-of-photogrammetry-and-remote-sensing en_US
dc.identifier.citation Okolie, C., Adeleke, A., Smit, J. et al. 2024, 'Performance analysis of Bayesian optimised gradient-boosted decision trees for digital elevation model (DEM) error correction: interim results', ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 179-183, doi : 10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-179-2024. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1872-8235 (online)
dc.identifier.issn 0924-2716 (print)
dc.identifier.other 10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-179-2024
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98121
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Copernicus Publications en_US
dc.rights © Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. en_US
dc.subject Digital elevation model (DEM) en_US
dc.subject Copernicus en_US
dc.subject Bayesian optimisation en_US
dc.subject Gradient boosted decision trees (GBDTs) en_US
dc.subject Machine learning en_US
dc.subject Hyperparameter tuning en_US
dc.title Performance analysis of Bayesian optimised gradient-boosted decision trees for digital elevation model (DEM) error correction : interim results en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record