Low-cost molecular methods to characterise gastrointestinal nematode co-infections of goats in Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Airs, Paul M.
dc.contributor.author Ventura‑Cordero, Javier
dc.contributor.author Mvula, Winchester
dc.contributor.author Takahashi, Taro
dc.contributor.author Van Wyk, Jan Aucamp
dc.contributor.author Nalivata, Patson
dc.contributor.author Safalaoh, Andrews
dc.contributor.author Morgan, Eric R.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-06T09:43:25Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-06T09:43:25Z
dc.date.issued 2023-06-29
dc.description AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS : Raw diagnostic, DNA extraction, and PCR data are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. All other original results including tabulated data, PCR results, and other materials are available on request where not included in the manuscript. en_US
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : ADDITIONAL FILE 1. TABLE S1. Raw baseline data on DNA extraction, quality, quantity and yield. ADDITIONAL FILE 2. TABLE S2. Primers and cycling conditions used for each PCR technique. ADDITIONAL FILE 3. TABLE S3. Nemabiome raw read results from Eurofins 2nd PCR amplicon sequencing. ADDITIONAL FILE 4. TABLE S4. DNA extraction costs. ADDITIONAL FILE 5. TABLE S5. HRMC peak temperatures and Singleplex PCR relative species abundance. ADDITIONAL FILE 6. TABLE S6. Proportional read differences between Mothur and DADA2 nemabiome pipelines. ADDITIONAL FILE 7. FILE S1. 72-well gel electrophoresis comb design. ADDITIONAL FILE 8. FIGURES S1–S5. FIGURE S1: Assessing quality of DNA extraction methods. FIGURE S2: Assessing GIN species detection likelihoods by DNA extraction method and infection intensity. FIGURE S3: High-resolution melt curves with pan-nematode ITS-2 primers. FIGURE S4: Nemabiome ITS-2 amplicon with the DADA2 IDTAXA pipeline. FIGURE S5: Cross-validation of PCR methods with nemabiome using the DADA2 IDTAXA pipeline. en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Veterinary diagnostics aid intervention strategies, track zoonoses, and direct selective breeding programs in livestock. In ruminants, gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) parasites are a major cause of production losses, but morphologically similar species limit our understanding of how specific GIN co-infections impact health in resource-limited settings. To estimate the presence and relative abundance of GINs and other helminths at the species level, we sought to develop a low-cost and low-resource molecular toolkit applied to goats from rural Malawi smallholdings. METHODS : Goats were subjected to health scoring and faecal sampling on smallholdings in Lilongwe district, Malawi. Infection intensities were estimated by faecal nematode egg counts with a faecal subsample desiccated for DNA analysis. Two DNA extraction methods were tested (low-resource magbead kit vs high-resource spin-column kit), with resulting DNA screened by endpoint polymerase chain reaction (PCR), semi-quantitative PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), high-resolution melt curve analysis (HRMC), and ‘nemabiome’ internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) amplicon sequencing. RESULTS : Both DNA isolation methods yielded comparable results despite poorer DNA purity and faecal contaminant carryover from the low-resource magbead method. GINs were detected in 100% of samples regardless of infection intensity. Co-infections with GINs and coccidia (Eimeria spp.) were present in most goats, with GIN populations dominated by Haemonchus contortus, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Trichostrongylus axei, and Oesophagostomum columbianum. Both multiplex PCR and qPCR were highly predictive of GIN species proportions obtained using nemabiome amplicon sequencing; however, HRMC was less reliable than PCR in predicting the presence of particular species. CONCLUSIONS : These data represent the first ‘nemabiome’ sequencing of GINs from naturally infected smallholder goats in Africa and show the variable nature of GIN co-infections between individual animals. A similar level of granularity was detected by semi-quantitative PCR methods, which provided an accurate summary of species composition. Assessing GIN co-infections is therefore possible using cost-efficient low-resource DNA extraction and PCR approaches that can increase the capacity of molecular resources in areas where sequencing platforms are not available; and also open the door to affordable molecular GIN diagnostics. Given the diverse nature of infections in livestock and wildlife, these approaches have potential for disease surveillance in other areas. en_US
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-02:Zero Hunger en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. en_US
dc.description.uri https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/ en_US
dc.identifier.citation Airs, P.M., Ventura‑Cordero, J., Mvula, W. et al. 2023, 'Low‑cost molecular methods to characterise gastrointestinal nematode co‑infections of goats in Africa', Parasites & Vectors, vol. 16, no. 216, pp. 1-15. https://DOI.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05816-y. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1756-3305 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/s13071-023-05816-y
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98066
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_US
dc.subject Low-resource en_US
dc.subject Faecal DNA en_US
dc.subject Species-specific PCR en_US
dc.subject Amplicon sequencing en_US
dc.subject High-resolution melt curve en_US
dc.subject Nemabiome en_US
dc.subject Haemonchosis en_US
dc.subject Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) en_US
dc.subject Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) en_US
dc.subject Goats en_US
dc.subject Malawi en_US
dc.subject Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) en_US
dc.subject SDG-03: Good health and well-being en_US
dc.subject SDG-02: Zero hunger en_US
dc.title Low-cost molecular methods to characterise gastrointestinal nematode co-infections of goats in Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record