Comparison of three sorbents for thin film solid phase microextraction of haloacetic acids from water

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van der Merwe, Petra
dc.contributor.author Forbes, Patricia B.C.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-04T08:00:57Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-04T08:00:57Z
dc.date.issued 2024-08
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY : The data supporting this article have been included as part of the electronic supplementary information. en_US
dc.description.abstract Water disinfection inevitably leads to disinfection byproduct formation, such as haloacetic acids. Many disinfection byproducts reportedly have adverse health effects and, in many instances, including four haloacetic acids, are classified as potential carcinogens. As the global awareness of these compounds increases, more regulatory bodies include certain disinfection byproduct groups in their regulations. Rugged, fast, and cheap analytical quantification methods are therefore crucial. In this paper, a thin film extraction method for haloacetic acids is outlined. Thin films were synthesized in-house using a spin coating procedure, which allowed for easy adjustment of the sorbent choice and film geometry. PDMS, Carboxen®, and HLB were of interest and their extraction potential for HAAs from spiked water was tested in three film variations. PDMS films impregnated with HLB or Carboxen® improved the extraction drastically compared to PDMS films. Specifically, HLB impregnated films achieved excellent extraction efficiencies for tri-substituted analytes (51% for BDCAA, 77% for CDBAA, and 92% TBAA), which are often present at extremely low concentrations in water. In addition to the extraction experiment, a computational model was applied to compare PDMS and HLB. Trends observed in the computational data reflected in the experimental results, showing the validity of the model and confirming that physisorption through hydrogen bonding was mainly responsible for successful extraction. en_US
dc.description.department Chemistry en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-06:Clean water and sanitation en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Department of Chemistry and the Laboratory for Microscopy and Microanalysis of the University of Pretoria and Rand Water. en_US
dc.description.uri http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Journals/JournalIssues/AY en_US
dc.identifier.citation Van der Merwe, P. & Forbes, P. 2024, 'Comparison of three sorbents for thin film solid phase microextraction of haloacetic acids from water', Analytical Methods, vol. 16, no. 30, pp. 5154-5165, doi : 10.1039/d4ay00634h. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1759-9660 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1759-9679 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1039/d4ay00634h
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98009
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Royal Society of Chemistry en_US
dc.rights © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. en_US
dc.subject Water disinfection en_US
dc.subject Thin films en_US
dc.subject Microextraction en_US
dc.subject Disinfection byproduct (DBP) en_US
dc.subject Trihalomethanes (THMs) en_US
dc.subject Haloacetic acids (HAAs) en_US
dc.subject Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) en_US
dc.subject PDMS thin films en_US
dc.subject SDG-06: Clean water and sanitation en_US
dc.title Comparison of three sorbents for thin film solid phase microextraction of haloacetic acids from water en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record