dc.contributor.author |
Pretorius, Marius
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-04-23T07:03:24Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-04-23T07:03:24Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008-10 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
No abstract available. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Pretorius, M 2008, 'When Porter’s generic strategies are not enough: complementary strategies for turnaround situations', Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 19-28. [http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContainer.do?containerType=JOURNAL&containerId=11434] |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0275-6668 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1108/02756660810917200 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/9743 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Emerald |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Emerald |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Porter’s generic strategy matrix |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Cost leadership |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Differentiation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Corporate competitive strategy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Resource munificence |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Causality of the distress theory |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Turnaround matrix |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Strategies and practices |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Corporate turnarounds |
en |
dc.title |
When Porter’s generic strategies are not enough : complementary strategies for turnaround situations |
en_US |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_US |