Abstract:
BACKGROUND : Opioid use disorder (OUD) is overrepresented among people with criminal justice involvement; HIV
is a common comorbidity in this population. This study aimed to examine how formerly incarcerated men living
with HIV and OUD in South Africa experienced HIV and OUD services in correctional facilities and the community.
METHODS : Three focus group discussions were conducted with 16 formerly incarcerated men living with HIV and OUD
in Gauteng, South Africa. Discussions explored available healthcare services in correctional facilities and the community
and procedural and practice differences in health care between the two types of settings. Data were analyzed
thematically, using a comparative lens to explore the relationships between themes.
RESULTS : Participants described an absence of medical services for OUD in correctional facilities and the harms caused
by opioid withdrawal without medical support during incarceration. They reported that there were limited OUD services
in the community and that what was available was not connected with public HIV clinics. Participants perceived
correctional and community HIV care systems as readily accessible but suggested that a formal system did not exist
to ensure care continuity post-release.
CONCLUSIONS : OUD was perceived to be medically unaddressed in correctional facilities and marginally attended
to in the community. In contrast, HIV treatment was widely available within the two settings. The current model
of OUD care in South Africa leaves many of the needs of re-entrants unmet. Integrating harm reduction into all
primary care medical services may address some of these needs. Successful HIV care models provide examples
of approaches that can be applied to developing and expanding OUD services in South Africa.
Description:
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS : The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the
corresponding author on reasonable request. The qualitative datasets are not
publicly available in order to protect the participants’ privacy and confidentiality,
particularly given the small sample size and the study’s geographic
specificity. Study participants with stigmatized traits disclosed rich, detailed,
and sensitive information that may unintentionally reveal their identities.