Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments : a systematic review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ortiz-Escobar, Luisa Maria
dc.contributor.author Chavarria, Mario Andres
dc.contributor.author Schonenberger, Klaus
dc.contributor.author Hurst, Samia
dc.contributor.author Stein, Michael
dc.contributor.author Mugeere, Anthony
dc.contributor.author Velarde, Minerva Rivas
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-25T11:47:11Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-25T11:47:11Z
dc.date.issued 2023-09-06
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. en_US
dc.description.abstract Despite scientific and technological advances in the field of assistive technology (AT) for peoplewith visual impairment (VI), technological designs are frequently based on a poor understanding of the physical and social context of use, resulting in devices that are less than optimal for their intended beneficiaries. To resolve this situation, user-centred approaches in the development process of AT have been widely adopted in recent years. However, there is a lack of systematization on the application of this approach. This systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022307466), assesses the application of the ISO 9241-210 human-centred design principles in allegedly “user-centred designed” AT developments for persons with VI (see Supplementary PROSPERO Protocol). The results point to a wide variation of the depth of understanding of user needs, a poor characterization of the application of the User Centred Design (UCD) approach in the initial design phases or in the early prototyping, and a vague description of user feedback and device iteration. Among the principles set out in ISO 9241-210, the application of 5.6: “the design team includes multidisciplinary skills and perspectives” is the one for which the least evidence is found. The results show there is not enough evidence to fully assess the impact of UCD in (1) promoting innovation regarding AT products and practices, and (2) Judging if AT produced following such standards is leading to better user access, wellbeing outcomes and satisfaction. To address this gap it is necessary to, first, generate better implementation of UCD in AT development and second, to strengthen evidence regarding the implementation and outcomes of using UCD for AT. To better engage with the realities of persons with VI, we propose capacity building across development teams regarding UCD, its principles and components; better planning for UCD implementation; and cross-fertilization across engineering disciplines and social and clinical science. en_US
dc.description.department Centre for Human Rights en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Ambizione grant funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Fondation Gelbert . en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/rehabilitation-sciences en_US
dc.identifier.citation Ortiz-Escobar, L.M., Chavarria, M.A., Schönenberger, K., Hurst, S., Stein, M.A., Mugeere, A. & Rivas Velarde, M. (2023) Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments: a systematic review. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 4:1238158. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1238158. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2673-6861 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3389/fresc.2023.1238158
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96645
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Frontiers Media en_US
dc.rights © 2023 Ortiz-Escobar, Chavarria, Schönenberger, Hurst, Stein, Mugeere and Rivas Velarde. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). en_US
dc.subject Visual disability en_US
dc.subject Visually impaired en_US
dc.subject Assistive technology (AT) en_US
dc.subject User–centered design en_US
dc.subject Human centred design en_US
dc.subject Innovation en_US
dc.subject Technology design en_US
dc.subject Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) en_US
dc.subject SDG-03: Good health and well-being en_US
dc.title Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments : a systematic review en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record