Pego ye e beakantswego ya nyakisiso ya Makxothlo (Lekgothoane)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Groenewald, P.S. (Pieter Schalk)
dc.contributor.postgraduate Mojalefa, Mawatle Jeremiah
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-04T09:27:06Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-04T09:27:06Z
dc.date.created 2024
dc.date.issued 1995
dc.description Thesis (DPhil (Sepedi))--University of Pretoria, 1995. en_US
dc.description.abstract Although Lekgothoane's collection of traditional praise poems as well as those of Phala and Ramaila appeared in the late 1930's, these works have never been thoroughly investigated and described. As a result, Lekgothoane becomes the object of study in this thesis. It is, however, impossible to discuss his entire oeuvre within the parameters of this study, and therefore attention is focussed on only one of his poems. The emphasis in the metrical analysis of the above mentioned work is on the fact that this poem is a traditional praise poem. Special attention is paid to the problem identified by Opland in connection with this type of poetry in Xhosa, namely that the metrical arrangement of the traditional Xhosa praise poem must be related to its performance. This hypothesis is however unacceptable for poetics. This study also confirms that the metrical arrangement of the traditional Sepedi/Northern Sotho praise poem is not determined by its performance. The Lekgothoane praise poem as a literary work is analysed from the following angles: (a) the author (b) the text (c) the reader. The biographical details collected with regard to Lekgothoane confirm the (later) discovery that he did not write nature poetry. The poem as text was described according to content, composition (structure) and style. The topic is an important concept in the analysis of the content, and it is distinguished from the theme which is a central concept in the analysis of the structure. Special attention was devoted to the title in the analysis of the poem's compilation. Various structural strategies, which indicate that the owls which are described could possibly be more than just birds, were then scrutinized. This suspicion with regard to the owls is confirmed by various structural segments which are then discussed, and the final interpretation, namely that this work is, amongst other things, also a satire, is confirmed thematically. The particular style of the work is described according to a theoretical framework developed by Kerkhoff. This is later developed into a practical model. Finally, the poem is also examined from the angle of the reader. In this section, the reception-aesthetics theory is however widely deviated from, and key concepts used by Jauss and Iser respectively, namely "expectation horizon" and "open places", do not feature here. The Lekgothoane poem is thus not assessed in terms of the above concepts; this investigation is conducted in an interpretive manner. Consequently, an attempt is made to indicate how the experience and/or the knowledge of the reader can deepen his understanding and interpretation of the poem. The owl poem of Malebana and of Van Wyk Louw, the secretary-bird poem by Leipoldt, as well as a statement made by Paul in the New Testament are all consequently included in this investigation. In the concluding chapter it is shown that Lekgothoane occupies a unique position within the traditional praise poem art, as he deviates from accepted practice, and as his work is a prediction of the poetry of the modern praise poets. en_US
dc.description.abstract Afrikaans: Ofskoon die versameling van tradisionele prysdigte deur Lekgothoane gedurende die laat dertigerjare verskyn het, is sy werk, soos oak die Phala- en Ramailaprysdigversamelings, nag nooit behoorlik ondersoek en beskryf nie. Hierdie proefskrif sander Lekgothoane daarom vir sy ondersoek uit. Dit is egter onmoontlik om sy hele oeuvre hierby te betrek. Daarom word die aandag slegs op een van sy gedigte toegespits. In die metriese analise van die werk word dit as tradisionele prysdig ontleed. lnsonder word die aandag op die probleem toegespits wat Opland ten opsigte van hierdie digsoort in Xhosa ge"identifiseer het, naamlik dat die metriese versorgingswyse van die tradisionele Xhosaprysdig met die voordrag in verband gebring moet word. Die hipotese is ewenwel vir die versleer onaanvaarbaar. Wat die metriese geleding van die tradisionele Sepedi/Noord-Sothoprysdig betref, bevestig hierdie ondersoek dat dit nie deur die voordrag bepaal word nie. As literere werk word die Lekgothoaneprysdig vanuit die hoek van (a) die auteur, (b) die teks, en (c) die leser ontleed. Die biografiese besonderhede wat omtrent Lekgothoane versamel is, strook met die (latere) bevinding dat hy nie natuurpoesie geskryf het nie. Die gedig as teks is na inhoud, samestelling (struktuur) en stilistiese inkleding beskryf. By die inhoudsanalise is die onderwerp 'n belangrike begrip, en word dit van die tema onderskei wat 'n sentrale begrip by die struktuuranalise is. By die ontleding van die gedigsamestelling is besondere aandag aan die gedigbetiteling geskenk. Daarna het verskeie strukturele strategiee onder die loep gekom wat daarop dui dat die uile waarvan daar geskryf word dalk meer as voels kan wees. Verskeie struktuurgrepe wat hierna bespreek word, bevestig die vermoede by die navorser, en die finale interpretasie dat die werk onder andere 'n satire is, word tematies verantwoord. Die stilistiese inkleding van die werk word aan die hand van die teoretiese raamwerk beskryf wat Kerkhoff uitgewerk het, en wat later tot 'n praktiese beskrywingsmodel verfyn word. Laastens is die gedig oak vanuit die hoek van die leser ondersoek. Hier word ruimskoots van die resepsie-estetiek afgewyk, en die sleutelbegrippe wat navorsers soos Jauss en Iser onderskeidelik gebruik, naamlik "verwagtingshorison" en "oop plekke" kom hier dus nie ter sprake nie. Die Lekgothoanegedig word dus nie in terme van bogenoemde begrippe beoordeel nie; hierdie ondersoek gaan interpreterend te werk. Daar word derhalwe getrag om aan te dui hoe die ervaring en/of kennis van die leser sy begrip en interpretasie van die gedig kan verdiep. Met die oog hierop word die uilegedig van Malebana en van Van Wyk Lauw, Leipoldt se gedig oar die sekretarisvoel, en 'n Paulusuitspraak uit die Nuwe Testament by hierdie ondersoek betrek. In die samevattende en slothoofstuk word daarop gewys dat Lekgothoane binne die tradisionele prysdigkuns 'n unieke posisie inneem, daar hy van die erkende samestellingspraktyk afwyk, en sy werk na die poesie van die moderne prysdigters vooruitwys. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree DPhil (Sepedi) en_US
dc.description.department African Languages en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Humanities en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96327
dc.language.iso Sepedi en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2021 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Traditional praise poem en_US
dc.subject Principles of metre en_US
dc.subject Metrical features ( of the caesura) en_US
dc.subject Features of style en_US
dc.title Pego ye e beakantswego ya nyakisiso ya Makxothlo (Lekgothoane) en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record