A comparison of risk factor investigation and experts’ opinion elicitation analysis for identifying foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) high-risk areas within the FMD protection zone of South Africa (2007–2016)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sirdar, Mohamed Mahmoud
dc.contributor.author Fosgate, Geoffrey Theodore
dc.contributor.author Blignaut, Belinda
dc.contributor.author Heath, Livio
dc.contributor.author Lazarus, David Dazhia
dc.contributor.author Mampane, R.L.
dc.contributor.author Rikhotso, O.B.
dc.contributor.author Du Plessis, B.
dc.contributor.author Gummow, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-31T06:04:17Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-31T06:04:17Z
dc.date.issued 2024-05
dc.description.abstract Foot-and-mouth disease is a controlled disease in accordance with the South African Animal Diseases Act (Act 35 of 1984). The country was classified by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) as having a FMD free zone without vaccination in 1996. However, this status was suspended in 2019 due to a FMD outbreak outside the controlled zones. FMD control in South Africa includes animal movement restrictions placed on cloven-hoofed species and products, prophylactic vaccination of cattle, clinical surveillance of susceptible species, and disease control fencing to separate livestock from wildlife reservoirs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate differences in identifying high-risk areas for FMD using risk factor and expert opinion elicitation analysis. Differences in risk between FMD introduction and FMD spread within the FMD protection zone with vaccination (PZV) of South Africa (2007–2016) were also investigated. The study was conducted in the communal farming area of the FMD PZV, which is adjacent to wildlife reserves and characterised by individual faming units. Eleven risk factors that were considered important for FMD occurrence and spread were used to build a weighted linear combination (WLC) score based on risk factor data and expert opinion elicitation. A multivariable conditional logistic regression model was also used to calculate predicted probabilities of a FMD outbreak for all dip-tanks within the study area. Smoothed Bayesian kriged maps were generated for 11 individual risk factors, overall WLC scores for FMD occurrence and spread and for predicted probabilities of a FMD outbreak based on the conditional logistic regression model. Descriptively, vaccine matching was believed to have a great influence on both FMD occurrence and spread. Expert opinion suggested that FMD occurrence was influenced predominantly by proximity to game reserves and cattle density. Cattle populations and vaccination practices were considered most important for FMD spread. Highly effective cattle inspections were observed within areas that previously reported FMD outbreaks, indicating the importance of cattle inspection (surveillance) as a necessary element of FMD outbreak detection. The multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis, which was consistent with expert opinion elicitation; identified three factors including cattle population density (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.47–10.21) and proximities to game reserve fences (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.92) and rivers (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07) as significant factors for reported FMD outbreaks. Regaining and maintaining an FMD-free status without vaccination requires frequent monitoring of high-risk areas and designing targeted surveillance. en_US
dc.description.department Production Animal Studies en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-15:Life on land en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The National Research Foundation of South Africa. en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.elsevier.com/locate/prevetmed en_US
dc.identifier.citation Sirdar, M.M., Fosgate, G.T., Blignaut, B. et al. 2024, 'A comparison of risk factor investigation and experts’ opinion elicitation analysis for identifying foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) high-risk areas within the FMD protection zone of South Africa (2007–2016)', Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 226, art. 106192, pp. 1-14, doi : 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106192. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0167-5877 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1873-1716 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106192
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96317
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.rights © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. en_US
dc.subject Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) en_US
dc.subject Bayesian kriging en_US
dc.subject Risk en_US
dc.subject Dip-tank en_US
dc.subject Human/domestic animals/wildlife interface en_US
dc.subject Kruger National Park (KNP) en_US
dc.subject SDG-03: Good health and well-being en_US
dc.subject SDG-15: Life on land en_US
dc.title A comparison of risk factor investigation and experts’ opinion elicitation analysis for identifying foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) high-risk areas within the FMD protection zone of South Africa (2007–2016) en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record