Groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment : an application of geospatial techniques and integrated IRN-DEMATEL-ANP decision model

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chukwuma, Emmanuel Chibundo
dc.contributor.author Okonkwo, Chris Chris
dc.contributor.author Afolabi, Oluwasola Olakunle Daniel
dc.contributor.author Pham, Quoc Bao
dc.contributor.author Anizoba, Daniel Chinazom
dc.contributor.author Okpala, Chikwunonso Divine
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-28T11:39:43Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-28T11:39:43Z
dc.date.issued 2023-04
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY : In addition to the supplementary material, all other data and materials are available upon request. en_US
dc.description.abstract This study evaluated the susceptibility to groundwater pollution using a modified DRASTIC model. A novel hybrid multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model integrating Interval Rough Numbers (IRN), Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and Analytical Network Process (ANP) was used to investigate the interrelationships between critical hydrogeologic factors (and determine their relative weights) via a novel vulnerability index based on the DRASTIC model. The flexibility of GIS in handling spatial data was employed to delineate thematic map layers of the hydrogeologic factors and to improve the DRASTIC model. The hybrid MCDM model results show that net recharge (a key hydrogeologic factor) had the highest priority with a weight of 0.1986. In contrast, the topography factor had the least priority, with a weight of 0.0497. A case study validated the hybrid model using Anambra State, Nigeria. The resultant vulnerability map shows that 12.98% of the study area falls into a very high vulnerability class, 31.90% falls into a high vulnerability, 23.52% falls into the average vulnerability, 21.75% falls into a low vulnerability, and 9.85% falls into very low vulnerability classes, respectively. In addition, nitrate concentration was used to evaluate the degree of groundwater pollution. Based on observed nitrate concentration, the modified DRASTIC model was validated and compared to the traditional DRASTIC model; interestingly, the spatial model of the modified DRASTIC model performed better. This study is thus critical for environmental monitoring and implementing appropriate management interventions to protect groundwater resources against indiscriminate sources of pollution. en_US
dc.description.department Future Africa en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-06:Clean water and sanitation en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.springer.com/journal/11356 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Chukwuma, E.C., Okonkwo, C.C., Afolabi, O.O.D. et al. 2023, 'Groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment: an application of geospatial techniques and integrated IRN-DEMATEL-ANP decision model', Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, pp. 49856-49874. https://DOI.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25447-1. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0944-1344 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1614-7499 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s11356-023-25447-1
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96271
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_US
dc.subject Groundwater pollution en_US
dc.subject Decision-making model en_US
dc.subject Drastic model en_US
dc.subject Environmental monitoring en_US
dc.subject SDG-06: Clean water and sanitation en_US
dc.subject Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) en_US
dc.subject Analytical network process (ANP) en_US
dc.subject Interval rough numbers (IRN) en_US
dc.subject Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) en_US
dc.subject Geographic information system (GIS) en_US
dc.title Groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment : an application of geospatial techniques and integrated IRN-DEMATEL-ANP decision model en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record