Plant-based meat alternatives in South Africa : an analysis of products on supermarket shelves

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Moonaisur, Nishanie
dc.contributor.author Marx-Pienaar, Nadene Johanna Maria Magdalena
dc.contributor.author De Kock, Henrietta Letitia
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-21T09:47:15Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-21T09:47:15Z
dc.date.issued 2024-01
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. en_US
dc.description.abstract All over the world, the development of products that resemble meat but contain predominantly plant-sourced ingredients is a prime focus. Meat obtained by rearing animals is associated with a range of important issues related to the sustainability of the planet. Locally, the topic is trending and the cause of various debates among industry role players. This study aimed to explore and analyze plant-based meat alternative (PBMA) products in the South African retail market as well as review internal (nutritional content and ingredients) and external (country of origin, cost/kg, and label claims) factors of the products. This study also compared the nutritional content of PBMA and comparative meat products. Seventy-eight PBMA products were included: plant-based sausages (n = 23), burgers (n = 31), chicken-style (n = 11), mince (n = 8), and an “other” (n = 5) category providing for a variety of product lines. Information from product packaging (total fat, saturated fat, fiber, protein, sugar, sodium, carbohydrates, and energy density) was extracted for all PBMA (n = 78) and comparative meat product lines (n = 28). Meat products tended to be comparatively higher in saturated fat, while PBMAs were higher in carbohydrate, sugar, and dietary fiber content. Sodium content of plant-based mince was approximately five times higher than beef mince. On-pack claims for PBMAs included vegetarian/vegan/plant based (80% of products), high in/source of protein (48%), containing no genetically modified organisms (GMOs; 16%), and gluten free (26%). The plant protein trend has prompted innovation in PBMAs, however, wide nutrient ranges and higher sodium levels highlight the importance of nutrition guidelines for their development to ensure healthier product offerings to consumers. The findings of this study may assist in exploration of consumers' preferences/attitudes or engagement with PBMA products, which could, in turn, guide new product development within the category. However, information about possible barriers, drivers, consumer expectations, and attitudes toward these products is also required. en_US
dc.description.department Consumer Science en_US
dc.description.department Food Science en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-02:Zero Hunger en_US
dc.description.sponsorship European Union's Horizon 2020. en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/fsn3 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Moonaisur, N., Marx-Pienaar, N., & De Kock, H.L. (2024). Plant-based meat alternatives in South Africa: An analysis of products on supermarket shelves. Food Science & Nutrition, 12, 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3765. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2048-7177 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1002/fsn3.3765
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96112
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley Open Access en_US
dc.rights © 2023 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Meat en_US
dc.subject Nutritional content en_US
dc.subject Plant-based meat alternatives en_US
dc.subject SDG-02: Zero hunger en_US
dc.title Plant-based meat alternatives in South Africa : an analysis of products on supermarket shelves en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record