Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of immobilization with three different drug combinations in free-ranging African lions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Donaldson, Ashleigh Claire
dc.contributor.author Meyer, Leith Carl Rodney
dc.contributor.author Fuller, Andrea
dc.contributor.author Buss, Peter
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-13T11:35:49Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-13T11:35:49Z
dc.date.issued 2023-01
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY : The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material. en_US
dc.description.abstract Thirty-six free-ranging lions (12 per group) were immobilized with tiletamine–zolazepam (Zoletil 0.6 mg/kg i.m.) plus medetomidine (0.036 mg/kg i.m.) (TZM), ketamine (3.0 mg/kg i.m.) plus medetomidine (0.036 mg/kg i.m.) (KM) or ketamine (1.2 mg/kg i.m.) plus butorphanol (0.24 mg/kg i.m.) plus medetomidine (0.036 mg/kg i.m.) (KBM). During immobilization cardiovascular variables were monitored at 5-minute intervals for a period of 30 minutes. Lions immobilized with all three drug combinations were severely hypertensive. Systolic arterial pressure was higher at initial sampling in lions immobilized with KM (237.3 ± 24.8 mmHg) than in those immobilized with TZM (221.0 ± 18.1 mmHg) or KBM (226.0 ± 20.6 mmHg) and decreased to 205.8 ± 19.4, 197.7 ± 23.7 and 196.3 ± 17.7 mmHg, respectively. Heart rates were within normal ranges for healthy, awake lions and decreased throughout the immobilization regardless of drug combination used. Lions immobilized with TZM had a higher occurrence (66%) of skipped heart beats than those immobilized with KBM (25%). The three drug combinations all caused negative cardiovascular effects, which were less when KBM was used, but adverse enough to warrant further investigations to determine if these effects can be reversed or prevented when these three combinations are used to immobilize free-living lions. en_US
dc.description.department Centre for Veterinary Wildlife Studies en_US
dc.description.department Paraclinical Sciences en_US
dc.description.department Production Animal Studies en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Copenhagen Zoo. en_US
dc.description.uri https://academic.oup.com/conphys en_US
dc.identifier.citation Donaldson, A.C., Meyer, L.C.R., Fuller, A. & Buss, P.E. (2023) Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of immobilization with three different drug combinations in free-ranging African lions. Conservation Physiology 11(1): coac077; DOI:10.1093/conphys/coac077. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2051-1434 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1093/conphys/coac077
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/95917
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2023. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Skipped heart beats en_US
dc.subject Medetomidine en_US
dc.subject Hypertension en_US
dc.subject Heart rate en_US
dc.subject Lion (Panthera leo) en_US
dc.subject SDG-03: Good health and well-being en_US
dc.title Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of immobilization with three different drug combinations in free-ranging African lions en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record