Abstract:
In this contribution, the authors explore recent developments in South Africa's approach to bank resolution, assessing compliance of its new regime with the Financial Stability Board's Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions (KAs). Emphasizing the imperative for orderly resolutions to avert financial crises, the authors scrutinize the post‐2008 Global Financial Crisis regulatory landscape. Until June 2023, South
Africa's approach to bank failure was limited to curatorship and liquidation under the Banks Act 94 of 1990.
Addressing gaps identified by international bodies such as
the Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank, and taking lessons from the failure of African Bank in 2014, South Africa has transitioned to a Twin Peaks regulatory model and also introduced a comprehensive resolution framework effective June 1, 2023, captured in the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017. This framework currently applies to banks only. The South African Reserve Bank now holds an explicit financial stability mandate and is designated as the resolution authority. The article discusses the design features for an effective resolution regime as recommended in the KAs to benchmark the new South
African resolution regime, noting overall compliance.
However, it acknowledges the need for further development in certain respects to enhance alignment.
Description:
This contribution is based on the comparative South African chapter in the author's thesis titled ‘Regulatory Measures
to Address Bank Failures in Zimbabwe’, supervised by Corlia Van Heerden. (http://hdl.handle.net/2263/80388)