Physiotherapists’ experiences of forensic audits by South African Medical Funding Schemes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Mostert, Karien
dc.contributor.coadvisor Van Staden, C.W.
dc.contributor.postgraduate Meyer, Lesley
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-27T12:43:42Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-27T12:43:42Z
dc.date.created 2024-05
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description Dissertation (MPhysT)--University of Pretoria, 2024. en_US
dc.description.abstract Background Forensic audits for billing irregularities have been conducted and researched in other countries, such as Australia, Canada, and the United States of America but not South Africa. Forensic auditors were reported to have been uncompromising in their belief that healthcare professionals were guilty of billing irregularities and had to be harshly penalised. The forensic investigators disregarded any valid reasons for irregular billing patterns, with resultant unfair audit outcomes. Small practices were forced to close their doors, leaving patients without medical support in small towns. Medical practitioners who presented their cases to a court of law were vindicated. No other studies were found regarding billing irregularity audits conducted on medical professionals or physiotherapists in South Africa. The Health Professions Council of South Africa conducted fraud, waste, and abuse audits on reported physiotherapists which was documented, and a survey was conducted on medical schemes regarding their opinion of fraud, waste, and abuse amongst medical practitioners. Aim This study aimed to explore and describe physiotherapists’ experiences of forensic audits conducted by medical funding scheme in South Africa, in the private sector. Methods An explorative, descriptive qualitative study was conducted with audited private-practice physiotherapists. Ethical clearance and informed consent was obtained. Participants were sampled through purposive and snowball methods. A total of 14 participants were interviewed, reaching saturation. Participants were interviewed using 11 individual interviews and three group discussions. Thirteen participants attended the group discussion in groups of five, six, and two participants, respectively. Four interviewers were used as a form of bracketing, and a semi-structured interview guide was provided to maintain rigor. Data were analysed using open coding and axial coding to describe the themes and subthemes. Findings were verified through member checking. Findings Six themes emerged from the rich data collected. The first five themes describe the experiences physiotherapists had, namely: 1) “unfairly persecuted, judged, and penalised”; 2) “overpowered and oppressed”, 3) “naively entrapped between a rock and a hard place”, 4) “distressed with a knife over your head”, and 5) “detrimental and hurtful”. These five themes emphasised that participants experienced the audits as unfair. Participants further described the experience as being worse than a stressful impact event, which led to detrimental outcomes, such as attrition of physiotherapists through, amongst others, closure of practices, and emigration. The last theme, 6) “seeking remedies pre-emptively and preparedly”, was about how physiotherapists wanted to improve audit processes to reduce its negative impact on physiotherapists. Conclusion Physiotherapists experienced the forensic audits adversely and made recommendations on how these may be averted. Further studies may investigate how these audits may be tailored more constructively in curtailing adverse experiences of physiotherapists. If this study’s findings are corroborated, then solutions need to be implemented by stakeholders who have been tasked with protecting the profession. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MPhysT en_US
dc.description.department Physiotherapy en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Health Sciences en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.other A2024 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/95395
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Physiotherapists en_US
dc.subject South African Medical Funding Schemes en_US
dc.subject Forensic Audits en_US
dc.subject Conflicts of interest en_US
dc.subject Billing irregularity audits en_US
dc.subject Experiences, health insurance en_US
dc.title Physiotherapists’ experiences of forensic audits by South African Medical Funding Schemes en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record