A review and comparative study of cancer detection using machine learning : SBERT and SimCSE application

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mokoatle, Mpho
dc.contributor.author Marivate, Vukosi
dc.contributor.author Mapiye, Darlington
dc.contributor.author Bornman, Maria S. (Riana)
dc.contributor.author Hayes, Vanessa M.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-13T09:46:50Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-13T09:46:50Z
dc.date.issued 2023-03-23
dc.description AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS : The data can be accessed at the host database (The European Genome-phenome Archive at the European Bioinformatics Institute, accession number: EGAD00001004582 Data access). en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Using visual, biological, and electronic health records data as the sole input source, pretrained convolutional neural networks and conventional machine learning methods have been heavily employed for the identification of various malignancies. Initially, a series of preprocessing steps and image segmentation steps are performed to extract region of interest features from noisy features. Then, the extracted features are applied to several machine learning and deep learning methods for the detection of cancer. METHODS : In this work, a review of all the methods that have been applied to develop machine learning algorithms that detect cancer is provided. With more than 100 types of cancer, this study only examines research on the four most common and prevalent cancers worldwide: lung, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Next, by using state-of-the-art sentence transformers namely: SBERT (2019) and the unsupervised SimCSE (2021), this study proposes a new methodology for detecting cancer. This method requires raw DNA sequences of matched tumor/normal pair as the only input. The learnt DNA representations retrieved from SBERT and SimCSE will then be sent to machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM, and CNNs) for classification. As far as we are aware, SBERT and SimCSE transformers have not been applied to represent DNA sequences in cancer detection settings. RESULTS : The XGBoost model, which had the highest overall accuracy of 73 ± 0.13 % using SBERT embeddings and 75 ± 0.12 % using SimCSE embeddings, was the best performing classifier. In light of these findings, it can be concluded that incorporating sentence representations from SimCSE’s sentence transformer only marginally improved the performance of machine learning models. en_US
dc.description.department Computer Science en_US
dc.description.department School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg None en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) through its Division of Research Capacity Development under the Internship Scholarship Program from funding received from the South African National Treasury. en_US
dc.description.uri https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com en_US
dc.identifier.citation Mokoatle, M., Marivate, V., Mapiye, D. et al. 2023, 'A review and comparative study of cancer detection using machine learning : SBERT and SimCSE application', BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 24, art. 112, pp. 1-25. https://DOI.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05235-x. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2105
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/s12859-023-05235-x
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/95182
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_US
dc.subject Cancer detection en_US
dc.subject Machine learning en_US
dc.subject SentenceBert, en_US
dc.subject SimCSE en_US
dc.subject Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) en_US
dc.title A review and comparative study of cancer detection using machine learning : SBERT and SimCSE application en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record